Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?
I’m convinced that so many Service Members struggle when they leave because the cradle-to-grave socialism of the military takes away a lot of day-to-day anxieties. Of course, those anxieties are replaced by other ones - seeing active combat, year-long deployments, etc.
But when socialism works well (see: U.S. military life), people often flounder when they are removed from that structure and tossed into the cold reality of the U.S. civilian economy and society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?
I’m convinced that so many Service Members struggle when they leave because the cradle-to-grave socialism of the military takes away a lot of day-to-day anxieties. Of course, those anxieties are replaced by other ones - seeing active combat, year-long deployments, etc.
But when socialism works well (see: U.S. military life), people often flounder when they are removed from that structure and tossed into the cold reality of the U.S. civilian economy and society.
People flounder when trapped in a capitalist economy, you say?
No, people flounder when they have been infantilized and dependent on others and now have to grow up and live independently.
Even our national parks know this; don’t feed the wildlife, they stop learning to forage for their own food
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?
I’m convinced that so many Service Members struggle when they leave because the cradle-to-grave socialism of the military takes away a lot of day-to-day anxieties. Of course, those anxieties are replaced by other ones - seeing active combat, year-long deployments, etc.
But when socialism works well (see: U.S. military life), people often flounder when they are removed from that structure and tossed into the cold reality of the U.S. civilian economy and society.
People flounder when trapped in a capitalist economy, you say?
No, people flounder when they have been infantilized and dependent on others and now have to grow up and live independently.
Even our national parks know this; don’t feed the wildlife, they stop learning to forage for their own food
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a response to market failures. Grocery stores are owned by corporations and don’t want to invest in low income areas where margins are low.
For some reason, it’s fine when rural white people have co-op grocery stores, often subsidized by a local or state government. But this idea in poor neighborhoods of NYC raises hackles?
Get bent.
Co-ops are member-owned, are not not government-subsidized. It's just a different business model, not one dependent on government subsidies. If a co-op fails, no taxpayer dollars are lost.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a response to market failures. Grocery stores are owned by corporations and don’t want to invest in low income areas where margins are low.
For some reason, it’s fine when rural white people have co-op grocery stores, often subsidized by a local or state government. But this idea in poor neighborhoods of NYC raises hackles?
Get bent.
Anonymous wrote:Yes fool. Food security is one of the most basic ways a nation can defend itself. If they only spent a fraction of what they spend on the military on food, our nation would be better and stronger
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a response to market failures. Grocery stores are owned by corporations and don’t want to invest in low income areas where margins are low.
For some reason, it’s fine when rural white people have co-op grocery stores, often subsidized by a local or state government. But this idea in poor neighborhoods of NYC raises hackles?
Get bent.
Co-ops are member-owned, are not not government-subsidized. It's just a different business model, not one dependent on government subsidies. If a co-op fails, no taxpayer dollars are lost.
Anonymous wrote:
What’s the worse case scenario? I honestly can’t think of one. Maybe no customers, bad produce? Then it just goes out of business. No harm. No foul. But an idea to solve a problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?
I’m convinced that so many Service Members struggle when they leave because the cradle-to-grave socialism of the military takes away a lot of day-to-day anxieties. Of course, those anxieties are replaced by other ones - seeing active combat, year-long deployments, etc.
But when socialism works well (see: U.S. military life), people often flounder when they are removed from that structure and tossed into the cold reality of the U.S. civilian economy and society.
People flounder when trapped in a capitalist economy, you say?
Anonymous wrote:"publicly funded, privately run* is the model for graft.
Socialize the costs, privatize the benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Commissary, anyone?