Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read the opinion article from crimson. So the author is saying let's not focus on learning how to code, let's just focus more on how to code with AI.
In that case, let's not learn how to do math and just use our calculators.
Though I agree with the author that all schools need to integrate AI into the changing world, we also need to have the foundational skills to check when things are wrong.
Your reading comprehension is poor.
Anonymous wrote:My kid goes to Harvard and is ROTC. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about and I'm happy you're not in my community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This reads like you want to steer the competition away from Harvard.
Also it shows you don't understand the point of a college education.
If you're all about the practicalities of learning a trade, you really shouldn't be in the business of bashing prestigious institutions.
Yep. Got the same reading from this.
Anonymous wrote:Elite universities are immune from these concerns. Brown, Dartmouth are the same or worse. They hire ivy graduates due to the prestige. There is no much difference between what’s taught at Harvard vs what’s taught at Haverford. As long as corporations continue hiring elites there is nothing to worry about.
Schools like JHU are different, they were built on German models. There is no prestige associated with JHU. Their success is measured by output.
Anonymous wrote:I read the opinion article from crimson. So the author is saying let's not focus on learning how to code, let's just focus more on how to code with AI.
In that case, let's not learn how to do math and just use our calculators.
Though I agree with the author that all schools need to integrate AI into the changing world, we also need to have the foundational skills to check when things are wrong.
Anonymous wrote:This is such a poorly written article I am surprised. The kid wants colleges to change their curriculum every time something is demanded in the tech market? Also, how does he expect to be anything but a less intelligent AI system if all you learn in a CS degree is the skills to do CS and none of the theory that goes into development. This reeks of mediocrity.
Anonymous wrote:Elite universities are immune from these concerns. Brown, Dartmouth are the same or worse. They hire ivy graduates due to the prestige. There is no much difference between what’s taught at Harvard vs what’s taught at Haverford. As long as corporations continue hiring elites there is nothing to worry about.
Schools like JHU are different, they were built on German models. There is no prestige associated with JHU. Their success is measured by output.
Anonymous wrote:My kid goes to Harvard and is ROTC. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about and I'm happy you're not in my community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, keep telling yourselves these things people. Keep putting down the liberal arts. You’ll see in the long run how that will work out.
The future of the world belongs to problem solvers and innovators and none of these applies to Harvard these days. They have drifted too far away from meritocracy.