Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Insurance executives make too much money. Not doctors.
Even if that’s morally true it’s not an explanation for systemic costs. One CEO making too much is a drop in the bucket relative to hundreds of thousands of doctors making much more than European/Canadian/Australian doctors.
You couldn't be more wrong
Anonymous wrote:Doc here. I left clinical medicine because the salary was rather low given my options. If I have to miss out on my kids life and my own life, I also have to maximize hourly compensation. Now I make more money doing something else. The expense of healthcare is not because of the doctors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Insurance executives make too much money. Not doctors.
Even if that’s morally true it’s not an explanation for systemic costs. One CEO making too much is a drop in the bucket relative to hundreds of thousands of doctors making much more than European/Canadian/Australian doctors.
Anonymous wrote:Low margin but hundreds of thousands of employees. That costs.
Anonymous wrote:Insurance executives make too much money. Not doctors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Dad's a retired pediatrician and the clinic/employer was basically demanding they see about 20 patients a day. My Dad ended up quitting because going part time with facility fees and insurance he'd actually be losing money. With high student loans the younger doctors are struggling a lot.
What does this mean? He must see at least 20 patients a day or he can see at most 20 patients a day?
Seeing 20 patients a day means 2.5 patients an hour, that's not a lot. I read an article saying an OP/GYN was required to see 4 patients an hour.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Dad's a retired pediatrician and the clinic/employer was basically demanding they see about 20 patients a day. My Dad ended up quitting because going part time with facility fees and insurance he'd actually be losing money. With high student loans the younger doctors are struggling a lot.
What does this mean? He must see at least 20 patients a day or he can see at most 20 patients a day?
Seeing 20 patients a day means 2.5 patients an hour, that's not a lot. I read an article saying an OP/GYN was required to see 4 patients an hour.
Anonymous wrote:Went to the ortho. Was seen initially by the trainee. The tech staff did all of the work for the xray. Doc comes in, does one minor mechanical test, looks at the xray for 15 seconds, and then prescribes steroids and P/T. Co-pay was $50, and they're probably charging my insurance well north of $400+ for the entite visit not even counting the trays. I think his entire visit was less than 4 minutes long. So in otherwords, if we were to extrapolate my $500 (approx.) visit out to one hour, he's earning $6000/hour, roughly speaking.
That is just patently ABSURD. Yes, we all know the middlemen like insurance companies, PBMS, etc. are all terrible and are driving up costs, but why are doctors and their practices untouchable? We treat them like gods in America point they are immune to criticism, but often times they do minutes of work for outrageous fees that AI could probably do soon for 1/1000th the cost. Why can't we ever talk about how doctors are also fleecing America and driving up healthcare costs? They treat patients like cash cows. More volume = more cash = fancier Porsche and bigger house.
I am just disgusted with the entire practice of medicine in America from top to bottom.
Anonymous wrote:My Dad's a retired pediatrician and the clinic/employer was basically demanding they see about 20 patients a day. My Dad ended up quitting because going part time with facility fees and insurance he'd actually be losing money. With high student loans the younger doctors are struggling a lot.