Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
No, they are not a fed and they work in construction. There is zero reason professionally to have this level of privacy
What are you insinuating, exactly? Remember, it could be someone they are communicating with who needs the privacy. Their affair partner, for example. (Is that where you were going with this?)
Whatever.
If my wife was "chatting with her gfs" on a self destructing, end-to-end encrypted app known for the inability to be read by others...... yeah, I'd very comfortably assume they are talking about something they really, really, really don't want me to know about.
Anonymous wrote:Some people want to keep track of US war plans in real time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
No, they are not a fed and they work in construction. There is zero reason professionally to have this level of privacy
What are you insinuating, exactly? Remember, it could be someone they are communicating with who needs the privacy. Their affair partner, for example. (Is that where you were going with this?)
Whatever.
If my wife was "chatting with her gfs" on a self destructing, end-to-end encrypted app known for the inability to be read by others...... yeah, I'd very comfortably assume they are talking about something they really, really, really don't want me to know about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
No, they are not a fed and they work in construction. There is zero reason professionally to have this level of privacy
What are you insinuating, exactly? Remember, it could be someone they are communicating with who needs the privacy. Their affair partner, for example. (Is that where you were going with this?)
Dw here. I’m friends with a professor who works on security issues. My group chat with her and several others is on signal.
Whatever.
If my wife was "chatting with her gfs" on a self destructing, end-to-end encrypted app known for the inability to be read by others...... yeah, I'd very comfortably assume they are talking about something they really, really, really don't want me to know about.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
No, they are not a fed and they work in construction. There is zero reason professionally to have this level of privacy
Anonymous wrote:Can you come up with a legit reason why your spouse would have this on their phone?
Anonymous wrote:I'm on several non-nefarious group chats that started on Signal, or switched to it when WhatsApp became a zuckfsck. "Privacy concerns" extend beyond low-integrity people trying to hide their hookups.
Our local mutual aid group uses signal. It's not that deep.