Anonymous wrote:If they do too well and are not fortunate enough to have law school funded, they could be stuck in BigLaw paying off BigLoans.
Also, scoring a 170+ on the LSAT is not the piece of cake that DCUM makes it out to be and not something everyone achieves with a little practice. How were ACT/SAT scores?
It's not something everyone achieves with a lot of practice, let alone a little practice. I scored around the 95th percentile and got recruited to teach for Kaplan so I have some insight into this. For the most part, the LSAT tests how you think. How logical you are. How good your reading comprehension is. Deductive reasoning skills. I'm just naturally good at deductive reasoning, it's how my mind works, and my reading comp skills have probably been top 5% if not higher since first grade (and fwiw there is plenty of stuff I'm not good at at all, and there are plenty of people I know who are significantly smarter than I am who did not do all that well on the LSAT because they just aren't super analytical). Will preparation help you with your LSAT score? Yes. Will help all that much? For most people, no. Especially now that the most coachable part of the test is gone (the logic games -- I could teach people how to approach those, and that would increase their score for sure).
I wouldn't think about ACT/SAT scores as a predictor of how one will do on the LSAT. My SAT was not particularly high (I have ADHD and quit paying attention to math around 8th grade).
Finally, I would recommend a basic logic or critical thinking class in college. Doesn't need to be fancy high-level philosophy or anything, just something basic with review of Venn diagrams, etc. That is arguably more helpful for folks who will eventually take the LSAT than LSAT prep classes.