Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

This is just technological cover for more racism and warehousing young black men in these so-called “correctional institutions.”

Again, Shot Spotter detects gunshots on the street. Are you pro-bullets flying through neighborhoods?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

ShotSpotter is racist.

It can tell what race the person shooting in the street is?

Take a look at where the devices are located in the city. Notice how few there are in NW (none in Georgetown???) and how many there are in Black neighborhoods.

Anonymous wrote:Further, it becomes a feedback loop, since the additional policing finds additional crimes, which means more policing which finds more crime.

If there isn’t more crime they won’t find more crime. That’s how policing works.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

This is just technological cover for more racism and warehousing young black men in these so-called “correctional institutions.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

It's racist because of the specific crimes selected as indicators of a need for additional policing. Why does graffiti lead to murder? Further, it becomes a feedback loop, since the additional policing finds additional crimes, which means more policing which finds more crime.

Because most of the graffiti is gang signs, sometimes they diss each other with tags in someone else’s block. It’s a thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

ShotSpotter is racist.

It can tell what race the person shooting in the street is?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

Start with the white collar crimes and there will be plenty of funds for wrap around services

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

ShotSpotter is racist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

No. If the police sent to an area they will attack the law abiding citizens. Look at what the FBI, ICE, etc are doing to neighborhoods all across this country.

People bring state and local law enforcement into their lives by breaking the law.

"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws".

Every single person breaks multiple laws every week, many every day. Most never even realize it.

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

Shot Spotter + AI + incident report databases + surveillance cameras all combine to identify target rich areas for law enforcement to surge resources to. It will make citizens safer.

https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS::shot-spotter-gun-shots/explore?location=38.892424%2C-76.991546%2C13.04&showTable=true

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

No. If the police sent to an area they will attack the law abiding citizens. Look at what the FBI, ICE, etc are doing to neighborhoods all across this country.

People bring state and local law enforcement into their lives by breaking the law.