Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS does this, and IMHO, it's a very good policy. College admissions results speak for themselves.
I'm a GDS parent of a student too young to have started the college app process, and based on my older, non-GDS kid's peers' experiences, I'm very thankful that GDS imposes this limit and makes students really think about what makes a good fit school, instead of just applying to as many "top" schools as possible.
But imagine that when your student is a senior that they are at the top of the class and are limited to 7 apps? It would be highly risky to apply to more than 2 "highly rejective" schools which includes all privates in the top 20 and the top LAC's so they will take a random chance at two of those and pick out two safeties likely mid range publics and perhaps Lehigh. Leaving them 3-4 "targets" from the top publics and T20-50 that is when your student is going to be told about the issue of yield protection for students like them unless the applying via binding ED so Tufts, Tulane etc are going to waitlist them or flat out deny them. You might not be as supportive of the system then.
Anonymous wrote:The only ones that do this have curated applicants guided by professional in house college counselors. I'm not talking about the 2500 student public high school where the guidance counselor counsels 500 students.
It is the realm of elite private schools, or magnet schools, that know who gets in where and why. So they have the luxury of doing this. A middle class, suburban high achiever is in a different game altogether.
Anonymous wrote:GDS does this, and IMHO, it's a very good policy. College admissions results speak for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:I've heard some as low as 7-8, which would seem to really hurt kids who want to shoot their shot with an Ivy or two and want to also to explore some merit options while having a safety or two.
But schools that are limiting to 10 or 12 makes a lot of sense to me.
I feel like there's so much competition coming from their immediate peer group. Kids shotgunning every top 30 college. The call is coming from inside the house!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS does this, and IMHO, it's a very good policy. College admissions results speak for themselves.
I'm a GDS parent of a student too young to have started the college app process, and based on my older, non-GDS kid's peers' experiences, I'm very thankful that GDS imposes this limit and makes students really think about what makes a good fit school, instead of just applying to as many "top" schools as possible.
But imagine that when your student is a senior that they are at the top of the class and are limited to 7 apps? It would be highly risky to apply to more than 2 "highly rejective" schools which includes all privates in the top 20 and the top LAC's so they will take a random chance at two of those and pick out two safeties likely mid range publics and perhaps Lehigh. Leaving them 3-4 "targets" from the top publics and T20-50 that is when your student is going to be told about the issue of yield protection for students like them unless the applying via binding ED so Tufts, Tulane etc are going to waitlist them or flat out deny them. You might not be as supportive of the system then.
7 is not 10
What school limits to 7? Don't know but OP's post says some limit to 7 or 8 and that seems likely to lead to bad outcomes and lots of rule bending . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS does this, and IMHO, it's a very good policy. College admissions results speak for themselves.
I'm a GDS parent of a student too young to have started the college app process, and based on my older, non-GDS kid's peers' experiences, I'm very thankful that GDS imposes this limit and makes students really think about what makes a good fit school, instead of just applying to as many "top" schools as possible.
But imagine that when your student is a senior that they are at the top of the class and are limited to 7 apps? It would be highly risky to apply to more than 2 "highly rejective" schools which includes all privates in the top 20 and the top LAC's so they will take a random chance at two of those and pick out two safeties likely mid range publics and perhaps Lehigh. Leaving them 3-4 "targets" from the top publics and T20-50 that is when your student is going to be told about the issue of yield protection for students like them unless the applying via binding ED so Tufts, Tulane etc are going to waitlist them or flat out deny them. You might not be as supportive of the system then.
Agree this is not an equitable process at least for the top 10% kids.
For the bottom half, this policy is not going to affect them one way or another.
It benefits the kids in the mid tier, top 20-50%. Now they have a chance to reach schools.
So, depending on where your kid sits, the perspective would be very different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS does this, and IMHO, it's a very good policy. College admissions results speak for themselves.
I'm a GDS parent of a student too young to have started the college app process, and based on my older, non-GDS kid's peers' experiences, I'm very thankful that GDS imposes this limit and makes students really think about what makes a good fit school, instead of just applying to as many "top" schools as possible.
But imagine that when your student is a senior that they are at the top of the class and are limited to 7 apps? It would be highly risky to apply to more than 2 "highly rejective" schools which includes all privates in the top 20 and the top LAC's so they will take a random chance at two of those and pick out two safeties likely mid range publics and perhaps Lehigh. Leaving them 3-4 "targets" from the top publics and T20-50 that is when your student is going to be told about the issue of yield protection for students like them unless the applying via binding ED so Tufts, Tulane etc are going to waitlist them or flat out deny them. You might not be as supportive of the system then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS does this, and IMHO, it's a very good policy. College admissions results speak for themselves.
I'm a GDS parent of a student too young to have started the college app process, and based on my older, non-GDS kid's peers' experiences, I'm very thankful that GDS imposes this limit and makes students really think about what makes a good fit school, instead of just applying to as many "top" schools as possible.
But imagine that when your student is a senior that they are at the top of the class and are limited to 7 apps? It would be highly risky to apply to more than 2 "highly rejective" schools which includes all privates in the top 20 and the top LAC's so they will take a random chance at two of those and pick out two safeties likely mid range publics and perhaps Lehigh. Leaving them 3-4 "targets" from the top publics and T20-50 that is when your student is going to be told about the issue of yield protection for students like them unless the applying via binding ED so Tufts, Tulane etc are going to waitlist them or flat out deny them. You might not be as supportive of the system then.
I've had 2 kids who were top10% of the class and knew the top cohort in both classes very well. Zero of these kids were shut-out from top 20 schools, despite having their apps limited . Yes, if your child wants the opportunity to choose between five top10 acceptances then maybe it's not the policy or high school for you. But most kids are able to narrow things down prior to applying and don't need the ego boost of getting into a giant number of top schools at the expense of their classmates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GDS does this, and IMHO, it's a very good policy. College admissions results speak for themselves.
I'm a GDS parent of a student too young to have started the college app process, and based on my older, non-GDS kid's peers' experiences, I'm very thankful that GDS imposes this limit and makes students really think about what makes a good fit school, instead of just applying to as many "top" schools as possible.
But imagine that when your student is a senior that they are at the top of the class and are limited to 7 apps? It would be highly risky to apply to more than 2 "highly rejective" schools which includes all privates in the top 20 and the top LAC's so they will take a random chance at two of those and pick out two safeties likely mid range publics and perhaps Lehigh. Leaving them 3-4 "targets" from the top publics and T20-50 that is when your student is going to be told about the issue of yield protection for students like them unless the applying via binding ED so Tufts, Tulane etc are going to waitlist them or flat out deny them. You might not be as supportive of the system then.