Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not going to read the article but the sierra club has not been super relevant for a long time now.
They also went heavy heavy into a litigation strategy a long time ago and the courts just haven’t been that friendly for progressive plaintiffs so that hasn’t been a great strategy for a while.
I give our environmental $$$ elsewhere.
+1
I thought Sierra Club was already far left, further losing relevancy from the mainstream. It’s on them for deciding to go broader without adequate funding.
It is much more than just going broader without the funding. As a single cause group they could draw support from many people/groups that might disagree on other issues.
There are tons of people who support environmental causes that aren’t far left politically, but if you embrace every far left cause du jour you end up alienating anyone not far left. (And let’s face it, there are a ton of far left political/advocacy groups competing for the same donations.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sierra Club is in a death spiral.
“The group has lost 60 percent of the four million members and supporters it counted in 2019. It has held three rounds of employee layoffs since 2022, trying to climb out of a $40 million projected budget deficit.”
What happened?
“During Mr. Trump’s first term, when the Sierra Club was flush with donations, its leaders sought to expand far beyond environmentalism, embracing other progressive causes. Those included racial justice, labor rights, gay rights, immigrant rights and more. They stand by that shift today.”
Predictably, a sh*tshow ensued, complete with absurd language guidelines (barring the use of the words “vibrant”, “hard-working”, “American” and the phrase “lame duck”) and degenerating into a circular firing squad of internal investigations.
Complete catastrophe.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/07/us/politics/sierra-club-social-justice.html?unlocked_article_code=1.zU8.sNby.J0zUKG0OY_mu&smid=url-share
Sounds like the right cancel another environmental group. This is what the right is all about.
^^^
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not going to read the article but the sierra club has not been super relevant for a long time now.
They also went heavy heavy into a litigation strategy a long time ago and the courts just haven’t been that friendly for progressive plaintiffs so that hasn’t been a great strategy for a while.
I give our environmental $$$ elsewhere.
+1
I thought Sierra Club was already far left, further losing relevancy from the mainstream. It’s on them for deciding to go broader without adequate funding.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not going to read the article but the sierra club has not been super relevant for a long time now.
They also went heavy heavy into a litigation strategy a long time ago and the courts just haven’t been that friendly for progressive plaintiffs so that hasn’t been a great strategy for a while.
I give our environmental $$$ elsewhere.