W^

She looks her age. Nothing wrong a that

I'm sure money and dermatology helped but her brand can't afford a procedure involving risk of obvious change.

She’s naturally tall and thin.

Anonymous wrote:She’s super energetic. I know someone who worked for her that said her staffers (who are very young) struggle to keep up with her schedule.

SUPER!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loads and loads of money can do wonders for helping you look younger.

It is probably less about good genes and more about the buckets of money she has acquired during her political career.

Nah, look at all the maga millionaires, they look like mummies. She's a runner, doesn't have a ton of sun damage, and she's not using fillers. Fillers are the worst.

Are you trying to imply elderly millionaire/billionaire Democrat donors look better? Why even mention their politics?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if she looks much younger than her age, but I do think she looks quite good for her age. I think it's possible she's had some work done, because for someone of her coloring to have so few wrinkles is rare. I don't think there's enough sunscreen in the world to maintain that naturally.

She’s definitely had work done under her chin. No one her age has an under chin area so taut!

What are you talking about, it's not taut at all

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if she looks much younger than her age, but I do think she looks quite good for her age. I think it's possible she's had some work done, because for someone of her coloring to have so few wrinkles is rare. I don't think there's enough sunscreen in the world to maintain that naturally.

She’s definitely had work done under her chin. No one her age has an under chin area so taut!

Anonymous wrote:Loads and loads of money can do wonders for helping you look younger.

It is probably less about good genes and more about the buckets of money she has acquired during her political career.

Nah, look at all the maga millionaires, they look like mummies. She's a runner, doesn't have a ton of sun damage, and she's not using fillers. Fillers are the worst.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loads and loads of money can do wonders for helping you look younger.

It is probably less about good genes and more about the buckets of money she has acquired during her political career.

So you clearly know how much personal wealth she has. Tell us?

Like everyone else in congress, Elizabeth Warren has many times over the amount of wealth she could have reasonably achieved on her actual elected official salary.

A quick internet search shows that she has a net worth of at least 12 million (Forbes) most of which was acquired once she became a senator. Other more recent websites put her at up to double that.

Yes, Elizabeth Warren is an average to below average looking woman (look at her younger pre senator photos) whose looks have improved due to all the multi millions of wealth she acquired over her years as a "servant" to the people.

Any multimillionaire who does minimal work and lives the privileged wealthy life of Elizabeth Warren could maintain similar "beauty" and fitness as Elizabeth Warren.

That's also when she started publishing books, and she's made a lot on book royalties. You can argue that her books are more successful because she's a senator, but she is more transparent about her finances than most elected officials.

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if she looks much younger than her age, but I do think she looks quite good for her age. I think it's possible she's had some work done, because for someone of her coloring to have so few wrinkles is rare. I don't think there's enough sunscreen in the world to maintain that naturally.

She would have scars around her ears if she had a facelift, and she doesn't (just double-checked my personal high res photos). But she DOES have wrinkles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has always been slim and was really pretty when she was young. She has clearly taken good care of herself and aged well.

This. I love this photo of her with her newborn:

The baby is adorable! She looks so young there….like a high school student.

She had her children very young, in her early-mid twenties.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loads and loads of money can do wonders for helping you look younger.

It is probably less about good genes and more about the buckets of money she has acquired during her political career.

So you clearly know how much personal wealth she has. Tell us?

Like everyone else in congress, Elizabeth Warren has many times over the amount of wealth she could have reasonably achieved on her actual elected official salary.

A quick internet search shows that she has a net worth of at least 12 million (Forbes) most of which was acquired once she became a senator. Other more recent websites put her at up to double that.

Yes, Elizabeth Warren is an average to below average looking woman (look at her younger pre senator photos) whose looks have improved due to all the multi millions of wealth she acquired over her years as a "servant" to the people.

Any multimillionaire who does minimal work and lives the privileged wealthy life of Elizabeth Warren could maintain similar "beauty" and fitness as Elizabeth Warren.

I don't know if she looks much younger than her age, but I do think she looks quite good for her age. I think it's possible she's had some work done, because for someone of her coloring to have so few wrinkles is rare. I don't think there's enough sunscreen in the world to maintain that naturally.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has always been slim and was really pretty when she was young. She has clearly taken good care of herself and aged well.

This. I love this photo of her with her newborn:

The baby is adorable! She looks so young there….like a high school student.

She was only 21 or 22 when her daughter was born.