Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is my experience with 2 kids so not a large sampling obviously.
Having one child at private and another in public, I can say that there is so much more hustling involved for my kid in public. He doesn't have the ready help that my private school child receives. He has to go out of his way to get help from his teachers. Tests are not returned so anything they want to discuss is during lunch office hours. For him, every kid is taking ridiculously high level classes and it's hard to stand-out, and there are so many students the teacher has to engage every year.
His teacher quality (and this is at a W-school) varies. His science teacher this quarter seems to be out 2 days each week for the past month. The kids are you-tubing and learning from outside books that they bought/borrow since classes don't have textbooks anymore. I am not sure how a student learns high level science with a teacher out so often.
So while I understand how important LORs are, I am not sure how important it should be considered depending on the high school.
That's not the issue, though, is it? Should be?
Its what is in fact important. LOR are extremely important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think transcript, activities list, and LOR are most important. Kids stress about an essay above all, but it’s not primary
I don’t think LOR are that important. They’re skimmed.
Transcript/rigor, activities, presence of hook or niche focus, high school attended, voice.
Anonymous wrote:This is my experience with 2 kids so not a large sampling obviously.
Having one child at private and another in public, I can say that there is so much more hustling involved for my kid in public. He doesn't have the ready help that my private school child receives. He has to go out of his way to get help from his teachers. Tests are not returned so anything they want to discuss is during lunch office hours. For him, every kid is taking ridiculously high level classes and it's hard to stand-out, and there are so many students the teacher has to engage every year.
His teacher quality (and this is at a W-school) varies. His science teacher this quarter seems to be out 2 days each week for the past month. The kids are you-tubing and learning from outside books that they bought/borrow since classes don't have textbooks anymore. I am not sure how a student learns high level science with a teacher out so often.
So while I understand how important LORs are, I am not sure how important it should be considered depending on the high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think LOR are huge. They're like the only component out of the applicant's control.
Are you talking about LOR from school or the additional LOR from outside of school?
Public kids don't have an advantage here with teachers having so many students. Last year, DD's English and Calc held lotteries for the 25 LORs they were writing. I don't know if they were just saying that (but secretly were selecting) so they don't hurt any students' feelings. Needless to say, it was an extra worry trying to get an 11th grade teacher in the core classes to write a letter.
Anonymous wrote:I think LOR are huge. They're like the only component out of the applicant's control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think transcript, activities list, and LOR are most important. Kids stress about an essay above all, but it’s not primary
I don’t think LOR are that important. They’re skimmed.
Transcript/rigor, activities, presence of hook or niche focus, high school attended, voice.
Anonymous wrote:I think transcript, activities list, and LOR are most important. Kids stress about an essay above all, but it’s not primary
Anonymous wrote:I think transcript, activities list, and LOR are most important. Kids stress about an essay above all, but it’s not primary
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not surprising they can, with experience, do a quick first cut.
“I see what your parents do/their degrees if any”
I suspect this only counts against you unless your parents are either (a) no college at all, or (b) extremely rich donor class. Everyone in between, it’s not even an advantage to be an UMC professional who went to a good school.
So are you saying if parents are doctor / lawyer pair (and are not donors to the school), then the expectation is a lot higher?
Anonymous wrote:So is this saying all would-be admits are looked at in the end by the entire committee?
Interesting... I thought some were automatic yes/nos and only the maybes were brought to committee. I suppose each AO has a quota.