Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider the least disruptive option for your kids- that probably looks like summer and extended holidays with dad, rest of time with mom. This is pretty close to a 70-30 split and keeps kids from switching homes during the school year which is so disruptive. It’s hard in the parents to miss long stretches with their kids but it should is about the kids stabilitynot the parents feelings.
That's not allowing dad to parent. Its also hard on the kids to lose a parent. Parents divorce each other, not the kids. Kids will adapt. They need both paernts equally.
Anonymous wrote:are the kids resisting being at the fathers?
Kids’ ages? Genders?
Is he the 30/20?
I think there is more to what you are saying. If both parents are on board with the arrangement then it’s really simple to file a mutually-agreed upon parenting plan with specifics or even one without any specifics depending on your jurisdiction. I’m guessing you actually have worries about your DH’s ability to commit to a real plan and questions about your kids’ resistance to being with him. I wouldn’t suggest a full parenting evaluation or whatever it’s called in your state, but what’s really going on here? Is your DH pushing for more time than he can reasonably commit to and your kids don’t want to be with him, and DH expects you to flex around his schedule? If so, I’m currently in that situation and a casual understanding is just not going to cut it. “Cooperative” and “coparenting” are not compatible with a parent who has an inflexible and unpredictable schedule and is typically just marketing language from that person or their attorney to get a more favorable outcome.
Sorry to sound paranoid but you’re raising a lot of red flags here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When do you get a break?
Right?? I wake up at 530 to get my solo (and DCUM) time 😂
I think it’s fair to consider this as part of the mix, because it’s important for my being a good mother to have some time for myself.
Other advice I have heard is to carve out 3 nights as Fri-Mon every other weekend so I have a real built in break for myself. But personally I don’t love that because it also means I’m handling an entire weekend solo by myself every other week plus the school weeks. It seems like okay let’s accept that mom will be burnt out by this schedule and just build in recovery time… I would rather find something that is well balanced all around. However I wonder if this aspect will get easier as the children get older, more capable of getting themselves to school, more activities on the weekends, etc. And we could shift schedules then.
Anonymous wrote:When do you get a break?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This reads like he isn't very interested in parenting time and you are trying to be extremely accommodating in the hopes that he will be a more involved father than he actually wants to be.
Op here. Thank you for the objective read. What do you think is the right choice if that is the situation. Be less accommodating? Expect he won't be involved and just plan on that? Or push him to take more time and force him to become an involved parent (several people have given me this advice in real life, but I have my doubts about what it looks like in practice)?
Well, you're right to have doubts. I don't think you can actually force him to be a good parent. He'll just be a sh*tty parent for longer periods of time, or cancel more often, or hire a lot of help or fly in his mom or something.
Some kids prefer to have every week same routine. Other kids prefer not to go more than a few days without seeing either parent. Other kids have reasonable logistical reasons to prefer a certain schedule (like one parent's house is nearer to an activity that they do once a week). Some kids like consistency, others appreciate flexibility. Nobody can tell you what your kids will care about most.
As your kids grow older they will likely want more autonomy. They might not want the same things as each other. They may have times when they don't go to the same school as each other, or have very different activity schedules. There's really no way to predict this in advance. You can't make a schedule now and expect it to work until they are 18+. That's not how child development works. Expect it to be renegotiated.
Don't forget to consider the unexpected-- snow days, sick days, etc. Think through your ROFR language and what he's likely to do to cover time when he's got custody but has a conflict-- a nanny service? Friends, family? A babysitter? Remember, you won't have any control over what he chooses to do for childcare. It's not a violation for him to use childcare, as long as he observes whatever ROFR you agreed on.
It sounds like you're going to get the lion's share either way-- either by agreeing to it in advance or by him trying to shirk and playing the My Job So Important card. So I think it's better for you to agree to it in advance because then you can have a more consistent schedule, and also get child support accordingly. If you agree to 50/50 and he doesn't do his share, it'll be a whole process to get child support increased.
Anonymous wrote:So sad…
Anonymous wrote:We do 70-30 and it works out really well for stability. I think a fixed weekly schedule is better for everyone. My ex has kid on Thurs night - Saturday dinner every week. We are very flexible about holidays etc. but probably better to start out with a schedule for holidays and vacations written out.
I agree with PPs that he needs to have a plan to reliably take his custody time and plan for contingencies. He needs to not have early work mornings on his days and needs to have childcare in place for after school. That said I don’t see how forcing 50-50 solves that problem.
Anonymous wrote:Is that best for you or him? They will get very little time with their dad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider the least disruptive option for your kids- that probably looks like summer and extended holidays with dad, rest of time with mom. This is pretty close to a 70-30 split and keeps kids from switching homes during the school year which is so disruptive. It’s hard in the parents to miss long stretches with their kids but it should is about the kids stabilitynot the parents feelings.
That's not allowing dad to parent. Its also hard on the kids to lose a parent. Parents divorce each other, not the kids. Kids will adapt. They need both paernts equally.
Anonymous wrote:I would consider the least disruptive option for your kids- that probably looks like summer and extended holidays with dad, rest of time with mom. This is pretty close to a 70-30 split and keeps kids from switching homes during the school year which is so disruptive. It’s hard in the parents to miss long stretches with their kids but it should is about the kids stabilitynot the parents feelings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We agreed on every other weekend and every other Wednesday from after school to after dinner. On average, he cancels about 3 times a year. They FaceTime 3 or 4 times a week.
Are you happy with this schedule? Is kid/kids happy?