Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re lucky if you get a young alum or a humanities or stem major from a decent lac. My kid’s app was read by a FGLi grad student who had completed her undergrad at a not even top 200 university. She almost threw out my kid’s app but her boss read it and clearly loved my kid. Kid accepted to multiple HYPSM.
How on earth do you know this?
Admissions file. Had AOs info —easy to look up!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Are they subject-matter experts, and if not, how accurately can they evaluate applicants for STEM programs — especially when it comes to understanding academic rigor and grading standards?
Definitely NOT subject-matter experts and definitely unable to evaluate research ECs. I say this as an engineering professor. I can barely understand the research papers colleagues in my department published if they were outside my area. High-level overview, yes, but nitty gritty details, no. Even if their paper is bad or wrong, they can make it sound really great with their writing because I wouldn't be able to tell. Now imagine an AO who has to know all areas of biology, chemistry, physics, mechanical engineering, civil engineering, computer science, math, etc. They don't even remotely exist.
With that said, the typical AOs know all the available AP courses because there are only so many of them and this is their job. They know which ones are fluff. They know multivariable calculus is supposed to happen after AP Calculus BC. They know linear algebra is another advanced math but is less tied to Calculus BC. If they are assigned to your region, they know the rigor at private/public high schools there.
But they are not god, you can easily throw them off with a little technical jargon in your EC description, making your research sounds more impressive than it really is. It's sad but this is what it has come down to in the college application arm race.
Thank you.
I’ve been observing the college admissions landscape for my own children, and as a hiring manager myself, I can say with confidence that the tech industry is still largely merit-based. I hope that colleges, especially the selective ones, take a truly serious approach to identifying the right students. Otherwise, degrees and higher education risk losing their value in the hiring pipeline.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re lucky if you get a young alum or a humanities or stem major from a decent lac. My kid’s app was read by a FGLi grad student who had completed her undergrad at a not even top 200 university. She almost threw out my kid’s app but her boss read it and clearly loved my kid. Kid accepted to multiple HYPSM.
How on earth do you know this?
Anonymous wrote:Parents of kids who did research: Of course AOs are brilliant and capable of separating the wheat from the chaff!
Reality: A STEM-majoring kid listed on Common App a science/math EC that reads "Presented at a regional science fair a research poster entitled 'Apparatus for Validating the Moisturity of Hydroxic Acid in Polyethylene Terephthalate at 298.15 Kelvin.'" Sounds super impressive, the two AOs reviewing the application nodded, preparing to give the kid a 10 out of 10. Only if they know that this is just a fancy way of saying 'Method for showing that water inside a plastic bottle at room temperature is wet.'
It is VERY easy to fool AOs, unfortunately.
Not trained
Not knowing what the scientific terms mean, AOs
are super-impressed with the
Anonymous wrote:Parents of kids who did research: Of course AOs are brilliant and capable of separating the wheat from the chaff!
Reality: A STEM-majoring kid listed on Common App a science/math EC that reads "Presented at a regional science fair a research poster entitled 'Apparatus for Validating the Moisturity of Hydroxic Acid in Polyethylene Terephthalate at 298.15 Kelvin.'" Sounds super impressive, the two AOs reviewing the application nodded, preparing to give the kid a 10 out of 10. Only if they know that this is just a fancy way of saying 'Method for showing that water inside a plastic bottle at room temperature is wet.'
It is VERY easy to fool AOs, unfortunately.
Not trained
Not knowing what the scientific terms mean, AOs
are super-impressed with the
Anonymous wrote:You’re lucky if you get a young alum or a humanities or stem major from a decent lac. My kid’s app was read by a FGLi grad student who had completed her undergrad at a not even top 200 university. She almost threw out my kid’s app but her boss read it and clearly loved my kid. Kid accepted to multiple HYPSM.
Anonymous wrote:The phrase “not the sharpest knife in the drawer” comes to mind.
Anonymous wrote:First job for alums who weren't successful in finding a job through recruitment. The alum may have previously worked as a student assistant (work study) in the Admissions office before getting hired to the entry-level FT role. So might already be "known" to the office.