Anonymous wrote:This seems to be the safest place for those who are targets for political violence perpetrated by the left.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems to be the safest place for those who are targets for political violence perpetrated by the left.
They are not in the military!
How dare they do this on taxpayer's dime. Insult to every single veteran of this country you dam traitor.
I am a veteran and I’m fine with them living where they do.
And, btw - it’s spelled “damn.” You appear uneducated when you get such a simple word wrong.
^sucker and loser^
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems to be the safest place for those who are targets for political violence perpetrated by the left.
They are not in the military!
How dare they do this on taxpayer's dime. Insult to every single veteran of this country you dam traitor.
I am a veteran and I’m fine with them living where they do.
And, btw - it’s spelled “damn.” You appear uneducated when you get such a simple word wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems to be the safest place for those who are targets for political violence perpetrated by the left.
They are not in the military!
How dare they do this on taxpayer's dime. Insult to every single veteran of this country you dam traitor.
Anonymous wrote:I support permanent government housing for all of them.
Anonymous wrote:People, do have any idea how many Republican members of government were assassinated in the past year????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Noem’s also swanning around on new private jets that cost $170 million. She’s too good to fly military planes or commercial, apparently.
More LIES from the failing @nytimes! These government planes are for the brave men and women of the @USCG.
The NYT wants our leaders to be incapable of responding to national emergencies while in the air, leaving DHS to be without leadership anytime the secretary is airborne.
This “journalist” clearly doesn’t understand the reality of protecting the American people 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and 365 days a year.
Because if they did, they’d understand that this is a MATTER OF SAFETY and MISSION READINESS. Senior military officials and cabinet members need secure command and control and rapid long range mobility.
So Tucker Carlson called former DHS secretary Janet Napolitano of being so inconsequential that she did not merit even a protection detail and now cabinet members deserve two Jetstreams due to "matter of safety" and "mission readiness"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Noem’s also swanning around on new private jets that cost $170 million. She’s too good to fly military planes or commercial, apparently.
More LIES from the failing @nytimes! These government planes are for the brave men and women of the @USCG.
The NYT wants our leaders to be incapable of responding to national emergencies while in the air, leaving DHS to be without leadership anytime the secretary is airborne.
This “journalist” clearly doesn’t understand the reality of protecting the American people 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and 365 days a year.
Because if they did, they’d understand that this is a MATTER OF SAFETY and MISSION READINESS. Senior military officials and cabinet members need secure command and control and rapid long range mobility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Noem’s also swanning around on new private jets that cost $170 million. She’s too good to fly military planes or commercial, apparently.
More LIES from the failing @nytimes! These government planes are for the brave men and women of the @USCG.
The NYT wants our leaders to be incapable of responding to national emergencies while in the air, leaving DHS to be without leadership anytime the secretary is airborne.
This “journalist” clearly doesn’t understand the reality of protecting the American people 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and 365 days a year.
Because if they did, they’d understand that this is a MATTER OF SAFETY and MISSION READINESS. Senior military officials and cabinet members need secure command and control and rapid long range mobility.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not surprised, I mean they basically have communist economic policies so why not take free housing for party members?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems to be the safest place for those who are targets for political violence perpetrated by the left.
They are not in the military!
How dare they do this on taxpayer's dime. Insult to every single veteran of this country you dam traitor.
I am a veteran and I’m fine with them living where they do.
And, btw - it’s spelled “damn.” You appear uneducated when you get such a simple word wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems to be the safest place for those who are targets for political violence perpetrated by the left.
They are not in the military!
How dare they do this on taxpayer's dime. Insult to every single veteran of this country you dam traitor.
I am a veteran and I’m fine with them living where they do.
And, btw - it’s spelled “damn.” You appear uneducated when you get such a simple word wrong.