Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great question. They are all weighted that I’m aware of but unsure.
The bigger concern was that schools like South Lakes requires more from its students than a school like Langley. So it’s easier to make NHS at Langley than South Lakes. Some high schools have minimum gpa required as 3.7 and others have a minimum at 3.5. That’s a big difference between having on average A- vs. B+ average.
South Lakes is an easier school overall so they should make the requirements harder.
Would think opposite - if think Langley is better school then there should be more kids getting 3.7 weighted so could do the higher gpa
It’s easier to get As at SLHS - so they make it a little tougher to get into NHS.
It’s harder to get As at Langley, therefore they drop the requirements a little.
How do you not get this?
NP - what evidence do you have that it’s harder to get As at Langley? I call BS and I’m not a SLHS parent.
SLHS is an IB school. Not that many kids do the full IB diploma. They do not have AP classes.
So the SLHS students would not be getting the 1.0 GPA bump so would be harder to get 3.5 or 3.7 at SLHS and easier to get at Langley if taking AP. Makes sense. Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SOO sick and tired of all the people that think everything in FcPS needs to be in lock step school to school.
Its the same school system. I'm one of those people annoyed nothing is lock step. Why have a large school system if you arent going to have similar standards from school to school? At least admit you have little influence on the schools and just provide assistance in certain central office areas. Its so annoying to hear how FCPS is so bad but then its not even the same from any one school to another. To me the state should have a standard for NHS.
Anonymous wrote:SOO sick and tired of all the people that think everything in FcPS needs to be in lock step school to school.
Anonymous wrote:Why do people think students at Langley are better than students at other schools. Very sad to see this negativity. The point isn’t about the students. The point is about the opportunities available should be consistent with prestigious national honor societies. If there were differences in past that’s an opportunity to correct and make better. Why can’t we focus on improvements without going into corners? We can do this people. This is a valid observation and an easy thing to improve.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great question. They are all weighted that I’m aware of but unsure.
The bigger concern was that schools like South Lakes requires more from its students than a school like Langley. So it’s easier to make NHS at Langley than South Lakes. Some high schools have minimum gpa required as 3.7 and others have a minimum at 3.5. That’s a big difference between having on average A- vs. B+ average.
South Lakes is an easier school overall so they should make the requirements harder.
Would think opposite - if think Langley is better school then there should be more kids getting 3.7 weighted so could do the higher gpa
It’s easier to get As at SLHS - so they make it a little tougher to get into NHS.
It’s harder to get As at Langley, therefore they drop the requirements a little.
How do you not get this?
NP - what evidence do you have that it’s harder to get As at Langley? I call BS and I’m not a SLHS parent.
SLHS is an IB school. Not that many kids do the full IB diploma. They do not have AP classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great question. They are all weighted that I’m aware of but unsure.
The bigger concern was that schools like South Lakes requires more from its students than a school like Langley. So it’s easier to make NHS at Langley than South Lakes. Some high schools have minimum gpa required as 3.7 and others have a minimum at 3.5. That’s a big difference between having on average A- vs. B+ average.
South Lakes is an easier school overall so they should make the requirements harder.
Would think opposite - if think Langley is better school then there should be more kids getting 3.7 weighted so could do the higher gpa
It’s easier to get As at SLHS - so they make it a little tougher to get into NHS.
It’s harder to get As at Langley, therefore they drop the requirements a little.
How do you not get this?
NP - what evidence do you have that it’s harder to get As at Langley? I call BS and I’m not a SLHS parent.
SLHS is an IB school. Not that many kids do the full IB diploma. They do not have AP classes.
That does not mean it’s harder to get As at Langley.
Tell someone who cares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great question. They are all weighted that I’m aware of but unsure.
The bigger concern was that schools like South Lakes requires more from its students than a school like Langley. So it’s easier to make NHS at Langley than South Lakes. Some high schools have minimum gpa required as 3.7 and others have a minimum at 3.5. That’s a big difference between having on average A- vs. B+ average.
South Lakes is an easier school overall so they should make the requirements harder.
Would think opposite - if think Langley is better school then there should be more kids getting 3.7 weighted so could do the higher gpa
It’s easier to get As at SLHS - so they make it a little tougher to get into NHS.
It’s harder to get As at Langley, therefore they drop the requirements a little.
How do you not get this?
NP - what evidence do you have that it’s harder to get As at Langley? I call BS and I’m not a SLHS parent.
SLHS is an IB school. Not that many kids do the full IB diploma. They do not have AP classes.
That does not mean it’s harder to get As at Langley.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great question. They are all weighted that I’m aware of but unsure.
The bigger concern was that schools like South Lakes requires more from its students than a school like Langley. So it’s easier to make NHS at Langley than South Lakes. Some high schools have minimum gpa required as 3.7 and others have a minimum at 3.5. That’s a big difference between having on average A- vs. B+ average.
South Lakes is an easier school overall so they should make the requirements harder.
Would think opposite - if think Langley is better school then there should be more kids getting 3.7 weighted so could do the higher gpa
It’s easier to get As at SLHS - so they make it a little tougher to get into NHS.
It’s harder to get As at Langley, therefore they drop the requirements a little.
How do you not get this?
NP - what evidence do you have that it’s harder to get As at Langley? I call BS and I’m not a SLHS parent.
SLHS is an IB school. Not that many kids do the full IB diploma. They do not have AP classes.
Anonymous wrote:Math is math. English is English. The honors classes or no honors classes are offered at every high school in fcps. Each curriculum level is consistent at each school. That’s not the problem. IB is same level of rigor as AP, and not all kids take those levels of courses at any of the high schools. If Langley is so much better than they should have as high of requirements as South Lakes.
Each Honors class could get a 0.5 bump up?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is that calculation weighted or unweighted?Anonymous wrote:Just anecdotal - I know for NJHS (at Middle School) it is up to the school. At our MS, they raised it to 3.75 GPA vs 3.5 because there were too many eligible kids at the 3.5 level.
Well, given the fact they are "invited" at the end of 7th grade, I would think there's not much weighting going on....the only weighted grade would be a 7th grader taking Algebra 1 or Geometry, right?
I've been told you can have one B, whatever that means.