Anonymous wrote:My parents have a SFH on a half acre in Mclean (22101), which, for non locals, is arguably the most sought after zip in the DC area. The house is owned outright. It is absolutely move in ready, and updated with new a kitchen and baths in 2014, but it is 'modest' at 3000sqf, 4 beds, 3.5 baths.
The lowest priced SFH in that zip is 1.8. My sister and I have been interviewing agents to either sell the house now or put it into a rental program until the market improves (spring 26/fall 26, lower rates when the Fed cuts, etc.).
Two of the 5 agents we spoke with tried to persuade us to list the house at 1.2. That's $200,000 BELOW Fairfax County's assessment. The other 3 suggested a list of 1.7- 1.8. We thanked the low ballers and declined their services and they both wrote us emails telling us we were 'ignorant' of the market and would 'NEVER' get 1.7.
The tone was rude, aggressive and unsolicited. It also smelled a lot like misogyny.
My DH wants to put them on blast, broadcast their emails, contact their brokers, slam them on the NVAR website, contact Richmond etc. I want them to suffer consequences too.
Have you ever gone scorched earth on realtors trying to take advantage of you?
If so, how?[/quote
Suffer the consequences of what? Giving you a price that you don't agree with? I just had a listing appointment with a seller who did a cheap flip in the DMV. Pulled no permits, wanted to list the house about $200k above what it should be listed for. I recommended a lower price not so I could make a quick sale and get the commission but bc that is the price that I think the market would bear. I also told the seller that I would not take the listing unless he retroactively obtained permits. Should I be blacklisted too? And BTW, the appraised value for tax purposes often is not the same as market value. And were you one that said the agents were gay alcoholics? WTF? Get yourself some help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In California houses are routinely listed for $100ks less than they sell for. It’s a pricing strategy as people bid and actually often over pay in the frenzy to escalate pricing.
The markets are here are pretty efficient; if your house is listed $400k below its “value”, buyers will bid it up.
But if it was renovated in 2014, it’s probably a 30-40 year old home — hardly a good vintage and that renovation is worn and dated. $1.2M might be accurate in our new post-DOGE endless govt shutdown DMV.
Maybe. But some lazy scummy entitled realtors just want the easy path to a commission and win whether or not there’s a bidding war. It’s very easy for the low-priced home to get scooped up by a buyer represented by the selling brokerage where it never really had a chance to be seen broadly. Especially true if the broker encourages you to leave the house unstaged and basically as is.
Anonymous wrote:Until you sell the house, you don't know who is correct.
You really sound... unwell. Why on earth would you harbor such deep anger about realtors giving you a price you don't agree with? This is a business transaction. Leave emotion at the door. Don't like their approach? There are a million other realtors.
I fear for anyone who interacts with you. Do you always understand disagreements as personal insults? Your behavior is truly disturbing.
Do not mess with the livelihoods of others. These people have not harmed you in any way. It would be cruel and unfair to harm them.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I get the annoyance with lowballing your house. But you don't get to blast their name all over social media over something as minor as giving you a low estimate. It's not like they've done something egregious to you. How would you like it if you disappointed someone and they decided to destroy you and had the means to do it?
Do onto others and all that.
Anonymous wrote:In California houses are routinely listed for $100ks less than they sell for. It’s a pricing strategy as people bid and actually often over pay in the frenzy to escalate pricing.
The markets are here are pretty efficient; if your house is listed $400k below its “value”, buyers will bid it up.
But if it was renovated in 2014, it’s probably a 30-40 year old home — hardly a good vintage and that renovation is worn and dated. $1.2M might be accurate in our new post-DOGE endless govt shutdown DMV.
Anonymous wrote:That’s absolutely not the most sought after zip in the DMV.
Georgetown, Kalorama, Mass Heights, Kent in DC all have much higher median home prices and some of the most expensive homes in the area.
Anonymous wrote:In California houses are routinely listed for $100ks less than they sell for. It’s a pricing strategy as people bid and actually often over pay in the frenzy to escalate pricing.
The markets are here are pretty efficient; if your house is listed $400k below its “value”, buyers will bid it up.
But if it was renovated in 2014, it’s probably a 30-40 year old home — hardly a good vintage and that renovation is worn and dated. $1.2M might be accurate in our new post-DOGE endless govt shutdown DMV.
Anonymous wrote:That’s absolutely not the most sought after zip in the DMV.
Georgetown, Kalorama, Mass Heights, Kent in DC all have much higher median home prices and some of the most expensive homes in the area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol 😂
Give us their names they told you the truth
Are you a gay, alcoholic, Realtor in Mclean? Might want to be careful unless you wan your DUIs posted online.....
Anonymous wrote:That’s absolutely not the most sought after zip in the DMV.
Georgetown, Kalorama, Mass Heights, Kent in DC all have much higher median home prices and some of the most expensive homes in the area.