Anonymous wrote:It was quite a scene at Kennedy tonight. At first, MCPS team tried to shut down general Q&A after their presentation by attempting to break parents to small groups. That didn’t go well… After a lot of loud complains from parents, they reluctantly allowed Q&A. I hope MCPS has the courage to keep that protest scene in their recording. The general sentiment of the Q&A was frustration, to say mildly. One community member of the design team said that the regional model was developed not thanks to their inputs but despite their inputs. What a shame to MCPS. Time to organize seriously against this madness.
Anonymous wrote:It was quite a scene at Kennedy tonight. At first, MCPS team tried to shut down general Q&A after their presentation by attempting to break parents to small groups. That didn’t go well… After a lot of loud complains from parents, they reluctantly allowed Q&A. I hope MCPS has the courage to keep that protest scene in their recording. The general sentiment of the Q&A was frustration, to say mildly. One community member of the design team said that the regional model was developed not thanks to their inputs but despite their inputs. What a shame to MCPS. Time to organize seriously against this madness.
Anonymous wrote:I've been thinking of writing my questions on signs and protesting outside the BoE meetings. The public should know what questions the BoE won't acknowledge or respond to. In my fantasy world, the news covers the protests and the questions are out there for all to think about. Then more people want answers and the reporters inquire why the BoE members won't address the publics concerns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was quite a scene at Kennedy tonight. At first, MCPS team tried to shut down general Q&A after their presentation by attempting to break parents to small groups. That didn’t go well… After a lot of loud complains from parents, they reluctantly allowed Q&A. I hope MCPS has the courage to keep that protest scene in their recording. The general sentiment of the Q&A was frustration, to say mildly. One community member of the design team said that the regional model was developed not thanks to their inputs but despite their inputs. What a shame to MCPS. Time to organize seriously against this madness.
Folks have to go to the press. The Banner has a new Montgomery County section.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was quite a scene at Kennedy tonight. At first, MCPS team tried to shut down general Q&A after their presentation by attempting to break parents to small groups. That didn’t go well… After a lot of loud complains from parents, they reluctantly allowed Q&A. I hope MCPS has the courage to keep that protest scene in their recording. The general sentiment of the Q&A was frustration, to say mildly. One community member of the design team said that the regional model was developed not thanks to their inputs but despite their inputs. What a shame to MCPS. Time to organize seriously against this madness.
I was there tonight. Parents made their voices loud and clear and they were VERY UNHAPPY with MCPS and its program analysis.
No one even talked about the boundary study. Almost all of the ire was about the program analysis. MCPS's attempts to contain and silence parents did not go over well and did not work.
Board members Laura Stewart and Karla Silvestre were in attendance. This should inform their votes on this program proposal.
Anonymous wrote:It was quite a scene at Kennedy tonight. At first, MCPS team tried to shut down general Q&A after their presentation by attempting to break parents to small groups. That didn’t go well… After a lot of loud complains from parents, they reluctantly allowed Q&A. I hope MCPS has the courage to keep that protest scene in their recording. The general sentiment of the Q&A was frustration, to say mildly. One community member of the design team said that the regional model was developed not thanks to their inputs but despite their inputs. What a shame to MCPS. Time to organize seriously against this madness.
Anonymous wrote:It was quite a scene at Kennedy tonight. At first, MCPS team tried to shut down general Q&A after their presentation by attempting to break parents to small groups. That didn’t go well… After a lot of loud complains from parents, they reluctantly allowed Q&A. I hope MCPS has the courage to keep that protest scene in their recording. The general sentiment of the Q&A was frustration, to say mildly. One community member of the design team said that the regional model was developed not thanks to their inputs but despite their inputs. What a shame to MCPS. Time to organize seriously against this madness.
Anonymous wrote:Just saw the in-person "engagement session" information being released today. As expected, MCPS strives to bundle them together and just give you 1-hour so you won't have any opportunity for "engagement". Wondering if we could start brainstorming ways to make louder noise? Holding signs? Inviting news writers?
"In the next few weeks, MCPS is inviting the community to participate in a series of Q&A engagement sessions on the boundary studies and academic programs analysis efforts. They are scheduled to be in-person sessions from 7-8 p.m. on:
Oct. 30, John F. Kennedy High School, 1901 Randolph Road, Silver Spring
Nov. 6, Watkins Mill High School, 10301 Apple Ridge Road, Gaithersburg
Nov. 10, Montgomery Blair High School, 51 University Blvd. East, Silver Spring
Nov. 12, Rockville High School, 2100 Baltimore Road, Rockville
Nov. 13, Winston Churchill High School, 11300 Gainsborough Road, Potomac
Nov. 17, Paint Branch High School, 14121 Old Columbia Pike, Burtonsville"