Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
It’s low even for them.
Ha, you are extremely wrong. My nephew got in last year TO with a high gpa and rigor, 4s and 5s on AP exams, and his SAT score was 1080. Some kids don’t test well and those are the ones who apply TO. A 1320 is close to the 25th percentile for SUBMITTED scores at UVA, why would you think it is low “even for them” (those who choose not to submit)?
A 1080 is not "not testing well." That kid can't even be considered smart with the watered down SAT. Talk about gaming the system. Hopefully they're majoring in lib arts and have no plans for grad school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
It’s low even for them.
Ha, you are extremely wrong. My nephew got in last year TO with a high gpa and rigor, 4s and 5s on AP exams, and his SAT score was 1080. Some kids don’t test well and those are the ones who apply TO. A 1320 is close to the 25th percentile for SUBMITTED scores at UVA, why would you think it is low “even for them” (those who choose not to submit)?
NO WONDER !!
That's why UVA ranking is dropping!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
It’s low even for them.
Ha, you are extremely wrong. My nephew got in last year TO with a high gpa and rigor, 4s and 5s on AP exams, and his SAT score was 1080. Some kids don’t test well and those are the ones who apply TO. A 1320 is close to the 25th percentile for SUBMITTED scores at UVA, why would you think it is low “even for them” (those who choose not to submit)?
Anonymous wrote:How was there a clerical error? Are you telling the truth?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
It’s low even for them.
Ha, you are extremely wrong. My nephew got in last year TO with a high gpa and rigor, 4s and 5s on AP exams, and his SAT score was 1080. Some kids don’t test well and those are the ones who apply TO. A 1320 is close to the 25th percentile for SUBMITTED scores at UVA, why would you think it is low “even for them” (those who choose not to submit)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
It’s low even for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
And it’s much higher than all the athletes’ scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
It’s low even for them.
Ha, you are extremely wrong. My nephew got in last year TO with a high gpa and rigor, 4s and 5s on AP exams, and his SAT score was 1080. Some kids don’t test well and those are the ones who apply TO. [b]A 1320 is close to the 25th percentile for SUBMITTED scores at UVA, why would you think it is low “even for them” (those who choose not to submit)?
Anonymous wrote:I would not accept this “clerical error” and have it fixed.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly I’d not bother applying
Anonymous wrote:If he marks that he doesn't want testing considered, they won't use it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although a 1320 is below average at UVA for reported scores, I would think it is well in the range for TO applicants.
It’s low even for them.