Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is SSIMS no longer an option? Because it will close in '31?:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1296678.page
Nope. They're going to redistrict lots of new neighborhoods to a dying SSIMS for 4 years and then redistrict them again to Sligo and Einstein right after. Because God forbid Whitman/BCC/WJ families don't get exactly what they want, but they know they can get away with pushing around DCC families.
It's not clear what they'll do. They obviously didn't give Flo Analytics the numbers to reflect the higher capacities at Eastern and Sligo, because the capital budget hasn't been approved yet. But they could opt to leave those MS assignments as is for now, given the expected later boundary study for SSIMS specifically.
Yes, they should have and could have, since obviously MCPS has known the SSIMS closure was in the works and could have given Flo the heads' up to leave its boundaries alone in all or at least one option. But instead, its boundaries change wildly in all 4 options, adding Woodlin kids and a portion of Flora Singer kids and in one scenario some ESS kids (and moving Forest Knolls and Pine Crest kids out of SSIMS.). It's just stupid, too, since the Forest Knolls and MK/Pine Crest kids stay zoned to Northwood under all the options and get moved to Sligo and Eastern MS respectively, when there's no good reason not to leave them at SSIMS for its last few years and then let them get reassigned later. Instead
So basically they'll make Woodlin, Flora Singer, MK/PC, and Forest Knolls kids (and maybe some ESS kids) all move middle schools for a few years-- including creating split MS articulation for all those schools under most options except Woodlin-- and then everyone ends up at Sligo and Eastern in the end like they would have anyway.
But everyone here says that the superintendent will only pick from one of the 4 crappy options currently on the table. So I guess that means this dumb and disruptive temporary musical chairs still needs to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is SSIMS no longer an option? Because it will close in '31?:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1296678.page
Nope. They're going to redistrict lots of new neighborhoods to a dying SSIMS for 4 years and then redistrict them again to Sligo and Einstein right after. Because God forbid Whitman/BCC/WJ families don't get exactly what they want, but they know they can get away with pushing around DCC families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is SSIMS no longer an option? Because it will close in '31?:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1296678.page
Nope. They're going to redistrict lots of new neighborhoods to a dying SSIMS for 4 years and then redistrict them again to Sligo and Einstein right after. Because God forbid Whitman/BCC/WJ families don't get exactly what they want, but they know they can get away with pushing around DCC families.
It's not clear what they'll do. They obviously didn't give Flo Analytics the numbers to reflect the higher capacities at Eastern and Sligo, because the capital budget hasn't been approved yet. But they could opt to leave those MS assignments as is for now, given the expected later boundary study for SSIMS specifically.
Yes, they should have and could have, since obviously MCPS has known the SSIMS closure was in the works and could have given Flo the heads' up to leave its boundaries alone in all or at least one option. But instead, its boundaries change wildly in all 4 options, adding Woodlin kids and a portion of Flora Singer kids and in one scenario some ESS kids (and moving Forest Knolls and Pine Crest kids out of SSIMS.). It's just stupid, too, since the Forest Knolls and MK/Pine Crest kids stay zoned to Northwood under all the options and get moved to Sligo and Eastern MS respectively, when there's no good reason not to leave them at SSIMS for its last few years and then let them get reassigned later. Instead
So basically they'll make Woodlin, Flora Singer, MK/PC, and Forest Knolls kids (and maybe some ESS kids) all move middle schools for a few years-- including creating split MS articulation for all those schools under most options except Woodlin-- and then everyone ends up at Sligo and Eastern in the end like they would have anyway.
But everyone here says that the superintendent will only pick from one of the 4 crappy options currently on the table. So I guess that means this dumb and disruptive temporary musical chairs still needs to happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is SSIMS no longer an option? Because it will close in '31?:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1296678.page
Nope. They're going to redistrict lots of new neighborhoods to a dying SSIMS for 4 years and then redistrict them again to Sligo and Einstein right after. Because God forbid Whitman/BCC/WJ families don't get exactly what they want, but they know they can get away with pushing around DCC families.
It's not clear what they'll do. They obviously didn't give Flo Analytics the numbers to reflect the higher capacities at Eastern and Sligo, because the capital budget hasn't been approved yet. But they could opt to leave those MS assignments as is for now, given the expected later boundary study for SSIMS specifically.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is SSIMS no longer an option? Because it will close in '31?:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1296678.page
Nope. They're going to redistrict lots of new neighborhoods to a dying SSIMS for 4 years and then redistrict them again to Sligo and Einstein right after. Because God forbid Whitman/BCC/WJ families don't get exactly what they want, but they know they can get away with pushing around DCC families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:one of the 8 options or a variation of one of the 8 options.
So...anything.
If there are surprises in Dec, people will be very upset to learn last min.
Someone will be upset no matter what they choose. They are deciding who to upset.
There’s a big difference between being upset after being informed and being upset by a last-minute surprise.
It doesn't really matter for the kids whether their parents had a chance to yell about something.
It matters if input is ever considered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:one of the 8 options or a variation of one of the 8 options.
So...anything.
If there are surprises in Dec, people will be very upset to learn last min.
Someone will be upset no matter what they choose. They are deciding who to upset.
There’s a big difference between being upset after being informed and being upset by a last-minute surprise.
It doesn't really matter for the kids whether their parents had a chance to yell about something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:one of the 8 options or a variation of one of the 8 options.
So...anything.
If there are surprises in Dec, people will be very upset to learn last min.
Someone will be upset no matter what they choose. They are deciding who to upset.
There’s a big difference between being upset after being informed and being upset by a last-minute surprise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is SSIMS no longer an option? Because it will close in '31?:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1296678.page
Nope. They're going to redistrict lots of new neighborhoods to a dying SSIMS for 4 years and then redistrict them again to Sligo and Einstein right after. Because God forbid Whitman/BCC/WJ families don't get exactly what they want, but they know they can get away with pushing around DCC families.
Anonymous wrote:Is SSIMS no longer an option? Because it will close in '31?:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1296678.page
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:one of the 8 options or a variation of one of the 8 options.
So...anything.
If there are surprises in Dec, people will be very upset to learn last min.
December isn't last minute, the vote isn't until March.
Dec is recommendation to superintendent, not to solicit further community feedback. Community gets to provide feedback in first and second rounds. Although not impossible, I don’t believe MCPS would do last min surprise without community input.
If you are saying that the superintendent has to pick one of the existing options, that is essentially saying that there's no point in giving feedback now. This set of options are bad for the DCC and it's not fair to say it's too late to weigh in and say "Do better by us."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:one of the 8 options or a variation of one of the 8 options.
So...anything.
If there are surprises in Dec, people will be very upset to learn last min.
December isn't last minute, the vote isn't until March.
Dec is recommendation to superintendent, not to solicit further community feedback. Community gets to provide feedback in first and second rounds. Although not impossible, I don’t believe MCPS would do last min surprise without community input.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:one of the 8 options or a variation of one of the 8 options.
So...anything.
If there are surprises in Dec, people will be very upset to learn last min.
December isn't last minute, the vote isn't until March.
Dec is recommendation to superintendent, not to solicit further community feedback. Community gets to provide feedback in first and second rounds. Although not impossible, I don’t believe MCPS would do last min surprise without community input.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:one of the 8 options or a variation of one of the 8 options.
So...anything.
If there are surprises in Dec, people will be very upset to learn last min.
December isn't last minute, the vote isn't until March.