Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I read it wrong, but I don't see any boundary change for BCC and Whitman? Are those two HSs excluded from Woodward study for the second round?
It would appear so. That's pretty stunning, to be honest.
Anonymous wrote:Am I read it wrong, but I don't see any boundary change for BCC and Whitman? Are those two HSs excluded from Woodward study for the second round?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And despite assuming this extra capacity at Wheaton that doesn't yet exist, they still leave Wheaton overcrowded over that inflated number. Wow.
Yup and WJ is now at sub 80% capacity. Shows what they care about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These are all much better for my neighborhood.
And that’s really all that matters to anyone
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And despite assuming this extra capacity at Wheaton that doesn't yet exist, they still leave Wheaton overcrowded over that inflated number. Wow.
Option D has Wheaton at 94.5%
Anonymous wrote:And despite assuming this extra capacity at Wheaton that doesn't yet exist, they still leave Wheaton overcrowded over that inflated number. Wow.
Anonymous wrote:My kids will graduate before any of that comes to pass, but I want to note here that with the new regional programs being set up for high school, in which different MCPS regions will specialize in different educational topics, for which high schoolers may commute, the boundaries need to be drawn to minimize long-distance busing in heavy traffic. Otherwise everything is going to be a NIGHTMARE.
Anonymous wrote:And despite assuming this extra capacity at Wheaton that doesn't yet exist, they still leave Wheaton overcrowded over that inflated number. Wow.