Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.
Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.
It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?
And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).