Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. Lying and cheating should be taken seriously.

For women, of course. But guys like the WeWork scammers, they get a pass

Issue with WeWork was different. The data was all there and clear. Nothing was made up. The business model just did not work and everyone ignored that it did not work.

Anonymous wrote:How is Wharton not implicated when it was a professor who made the fake accounts??

First Wharton would not be implicated because they did nothing. It was a professor there who did it on his own. So nothing for Wharton. For the professor, what he did was not illegal. Full stop. He did not make fake accounts. It was how the data was used that was illegal.

Ms. Javice’s legal team, which recently added Alexandra Shapiro, one of Sean Combs’s lawyers, presented 114 letters of support from people hoping to persuade the judge to be lenient in his sentencing. Among them were four rabbis, one cantor, a formerly incarcerated judge, two doormen and a person who works at the marina near Ms. Javice’s Miami Beach residence.

One letter writer noted that Judge Hellerstein had spoken at his great-uncle’s funeral. And many people mentioned Ms. Javice’s ongoing fertility treatments and how several years in prison could affect her ability to have children.

----

Maybe don't spit in the court's face if you want a light sentence.

Anonymous wrote:Curious what role if any JP Morgan played in the derivatives schemes that led to the Great Recession in 2008.

That was caused by mortgage fraud on Main Street not on Wall Street. They made it worse but it was a failing of many many normal people.

Anonymous wrote:How is Wharton not implicated when it was a professor who made the fake accounts??

Because what you are saying is not true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. Lying and cheating should be taken seriously.

For women, of course. But guys like the WeWork scammers, they get a pass

This. I'm not saying what she did was right. Or what Elizabeth Holmes did. Or Martha Stewart, but as much as we eviscerate bad women leaders, we venerate bad men for the same immoral, illegal behaviors.

Sometimes we even elect them.

Bot post

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ and nothing for Adam Neumann

His crime?

Not charged. That’s the point. But look him up. Tons of fraud against investors, lies, taking money etc.

He was booted with a 2B exit package and is now investing again

So he's guilty because he wasn't charged?

Curious what role if any JP Morgan played in the derivatives schemes that led to the Great Recession in 2008.

Looking forward to seeing her prison style of using coke cans to do her face framing layers

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe she countersued JPM claiming they didn’t do their due diligence. That’s ballsy.

Grasping at straws. She knew she was cooked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good. Lying and cheating should be taken seriously.

For women, of course. But guys like the WeWork scammers, they get a pass

This. I'm not saying what she did was right. Or what Elizabeth Holmes did. Or Martha Stewart, but as much as we eviscerate bad women leaders, we venerate bad men for the same immoral, illegal behaviors.

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe she countersued JPM claiming they didn’t do their due diligence. That’s ballsy.

Well they didn’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ and nothing for Adam Neumann

His crime?

Not charged. That’s the point. But look him up. Tons of fraud against investors, lies, taking money etc.

He was booted with a 2B exit package and is now investing again

Anonymous wrote:So JP Morgan cares about *some* crimes involving young women.

Exactly.