Anonymous wrote:I’m a very big fan of everyone defending this. None of the justifications make any sense. All you need to know is:
18 X $3000 < 22 X $3000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks - I had known that top teams had this, like MLS next, but didn't know it became common for lower teams as kids aged. I guess each sport has its pluses and minuses, including the high school one my son now does, but at least it is lower-cost.
You didn't specify "lower level" teams in your OP. MLS next is not the only "top" level team for boys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From what I have seen over the years, it's very common for the highest level, but not common for lower level (NCSL or ECNL RL).
The level shouldn't matter for the roster size. In fact for lower level teams, it should be more players since many won't show up. HS ages, if you're not the star or on a high level team, the kids find other things to do.
Ignorant statement of the highest flight. The more players there the less time a player gets on average. Simple math.