Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A large private school is no different as a practical matter from a top state flagship.
Compare class sizes
Anonymous wrote:A large private school is no different as a practical matter from a top state flagship.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly think the reason they don’t list private schools separately is that they fear most if not all would rapidly become peripheral to the college conversation, much as SLACs are today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of this? Is it just so the following can move up the list?
23 - USC
24 - NYU
25 - BC, Tufts
27 - BU
28 - Lehigh, Northeastern, URochester
How about we separate the <25K student schools from the >25K schools? I can come up with lots of ways to split it to make things look teh way I would like.
NP and personal opinion, but as a single parent with a good (not fantastic) income we're likely not qualifying for significant financial aid from OOS publics but probably will from some of the privates. UVA isn't a guarantee here. Michigan, Berkeley would likely be full pay at 88k or so - so it's nice to a filtered look like this for perspective. There are plenty of factors in applications, though, and this is just one.
Those 3 schools being omitted from the list make no difference in the ability to understand the options. OP is just trying to make some school that is lower than publics look more desirable. OK. If that's important to them......
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of this? Is it just so the following can move up the list?
23 - USC
24 - NYU
25 - BC, Tufts
27 - BU
28 - Lehigh, Northeastern, URochester
How about we separate the <25K student schools from the >25K schools? I can come up with lots of ways to split it to make things look teh way I would like.
NP and personal opinion, but as a single parent with a good (not fantastic) income we're likely not qualifying for significant financial aid from OOS publics but probably will from some of the privates. UVA isn't a guarantee here. Michigan, Berkeley would likely be full pay at 88k or so - so it's nice to a filtered look like this for perspective. There are plenty of factors in applications, though, and this is just one.
Those 3 schools being omitted from the list make no difference in the ability to understand the options. OP is just trying to make some school that is lower than publics look more desirable. OK. If that's important to them......
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of this? Is it just so the following can move up the list?
23 - USC
24 - NYU
25 - BC, Tufts
27 - BU
28 - Lehigh, Northeastern, URochester
How about we separate the <25K student schools from the >25K schools? I can come up with lots of ways to split it to make things look teh way I would like.
NP and personal opinion, but as a single parent with a good (not fantastic) income we're likely not qualifying for significant financial aid from OOS publics but probably will from some of the privates. UVA isn't a guarantee here. Michigan, Berkeley would likely be full pay at 88k or so - so it's nice to a filtered look like this for perspective. There are plenty of factors in applications, though, and this is just one.
Anonymous wrote:Schools like BC, BU, NEU, and Tufts(lesser extent) are not on any top 25 lists. Those schools exist for kids that want to go to cold Boston for 4 years but couldn’t get into top schools. Average at best they have low acceptance rates for lots of mediocre students.
Anonymous wrote:Schools like BC, BU, NEU, and Tufts(lesser extent) are not on any top 25 lists. Those schools exist for kids that want to go to cold Boston for 4 years but couldn’t get into top schools. Average at best they have low acceptance rates for lots of mediocre students.
Anonymous wrote:Schools like BC, BU, NEU, and Tufts(lesser extent) are not on any top 25 lists. Those schools exist for kids that want to go to cold Boston for 4 years but couldn’t get into top schools. Average at best they have low acceptance rates for lots of mediocre students.
Anonymous wrote:1 - Princeton
2 - MIT
3 - Harvard
4 - Stanford, Yale
6 - UChicago
7 - Duke, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, UPenn
11 - Caltech
12 - Cornell
13 - Brown, Dartmouth
15 - Columbia
16 - Rice, Vanderbilt
18 - Carnegie Mellon, Notre Dame, WUSTL
21 - Emory, Georgetown
23 - USC
24 - NYU
25 - BC, Tufts
27 - BU
28 - Lehigh, Northeastern, URochester
Privates better be ranked separately from Publics like LACs.
Anonymous wrote:Schools like BC, BU, NEU, and Tufts(lesser extent) are not on any top 25 lists. Those schools exist for kids that want to go to cold Boston for 4 years but couldn’t get into top schools. Average at best they have low acceptance rates for lots of mediocre students.
Anonymous wrote:What is the point of this? Is it just so the following can move up the list?
23 - USC
24 - NYU
25 - BC, Tufts
27 - BU
28 - Lehigh, Northeastern, URochester
How about we separate the <25K student schools from the >25K schools? I can come up with lots of ways to split it to make things look teh way I would like.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly think the reason they don’t list private schools separately is that they fear most if not all would rapidly become peripheral to the college conversation, much as SLACs are today.