Anonymous wrote:The Target boycott has worked pretty well. And far fewer people are driving Teslas.
Anonymous wrote:This instead of the Fox affiliate?
Anonymous wrote:Channel 50 is the NextStar station
Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you want businesses to operate as reflections of your political values instead of as enterprises intended to make money for their shareholders and to provide employment for their employees.
You do realize that if a business fails to make money, it becomes unavailable to provide employment for workers, and it stops paying taxes.
Or maybe you think businesses are actually social services, with profitability being irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:One good thing about the Kimmel firing is that it has increased public awareness of Sinclair. They have been amassing power for years, unchecked.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you want businesses to operate as reflections of your political values instead of as enterprises intended to make money for their shareholders and to provide employment for their employees.
You do realize that if a business fails to make money, it becomes unavailable to provide employment for workers, and it stops paying taxes.
Or maybe you think businesses are actually social services, with profitability being irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you want businesses to operate as reflections of your political values instead of as enterprises intended to make money for their shareholders and to provide employment for their employees.
You do realize that if a business fails to make money, it becomes unavailable to provide employment for workers, and it stops paying taxes.
Or maybe you think businesses are actually social services, with profitability being irrelevant.
This issue has nothing to do with business and everything to do with freedom of speech.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.
Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.
So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you want businesses to operate as reflections of your political values instead of as enterprises intended to make money for their shareholders and to provide employment for their employees.
You do realize that if a business fails to make money, it becomes unavailable to provide employment for workers, and it stops paying taxes.
Or maybe you think businesses are actually social services, with profitability being irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a list of their advertisers?
From last night’s 11pm 7 on your side news:
11:17: Washington Area Toyota Dealers
11:22: McCarthy Home Services
11:24: McCarthy Home Services
11:27: Long Home
11:29: Window World
11:31: Kuhl, FH Furr, Koons
11:32: Marks & Harrison
11:33: Long Fence
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a list of their advertisers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you want businesses to operate as reflections of your political values instead of as enterprises intended to make money for their shareholders and to provide employment for their employees.
You do realize that if a business fails to make money, it becomes unavailable to provide employment for workers, and it stops paying taxes.
Or maybe you think businesses are actually social services, with profitability being irrelevant.
Yes, I want to support businesses that support my political values.