Anonymous wrote:Well this tracks because the GOP doesn’t want a working government.
Statements like this make me realize how dumb people are. They don’t understand what government does. They don’t understand AI and AI’s limits.
Anonymous wrote:https://oligarchwatch.substack.com/p/the-little-known-think-tank-pushing
"A think tank with ties to right-wing billionaires Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Charles Koch, the Foundation for American Innovation (FAI), is pushing a radical plan to replace large swaths of the federal government with artificial intelligence.
FAI suggests up to 30% of federal workers could be replaced by AI."
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/13/ai-is-opening-a-maga-trump-split-00534925
"Trump’s rush toward AI is exposing an important faultline in the Republican coalition: Many of its voters and leaders deeply mistrust the power of Big Tech, but Trump himself has worked closely with industry CEOs to deliver on their priorities."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…
Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.
As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?
Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.
The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.
It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.
That is simply wrong. Most federal employees don’t want jobs leaving the US, certainly didn’t cheer it on, though they may have encouraged miners to code because lung cancer sucks…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…
Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.
As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?
Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.
The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.
It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.
That's just it. Without regulations, the miners are screwed and will end up walking around with oxygen tanks (best case scenario). Trump will just toss a Bible at them and tell them everyone's praying hard for them to get well so they can get back to work.
That is simply wrong. Most federal employees don’t want jobs leaving the US, certainly didn’t cheer it on, though they may have encouraged miners to code because lung cancer sucks…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…
Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.
As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?
Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.
The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.
It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Most companies want to replace 30% or more of staff with AI. That’s why OpenAI has a $300B slush fund to pour into Oracles coffers.
Anonymous wrote:AI is not, and will never be the future. It is so baffling to me how MAGA has a severe love addiction to AI and does not even seem to care about the concerns elsewhere it has.
Anonymous wrote:AI is a wet dream of the tech bros.
The data centers use a ton of highly polluting electricity (coal power!).
AI is created by humans and has many, many flaws, as do humans.
I believe those data centers are going to be the next Blockbuster Video stores — largely abandoned warehouses full of old tech — in A decade
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…
Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.
As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?
Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.
Anonymous wrote:AI is a wet dream of the tech bros.
The data centers use a ton of highly polluting electricity (coal power!).
AI is created by humans and has many, many flaws, as do humans.
I believe those data centers are going to be the next Blockbuster Video stores — largely abandoned warehouses full of old tech — in A decade
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…
Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.
As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?