[/b]Anonymous[b wrote:]I didn't send my boys because I view it as elitist (and dumb). I was asked by a number of moms (of both girls and boys) to sign my kids up with theirs and I refused to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just transitioned from public to private for middle school, where half the grade is doing Capital Cotillion, and there is general consternation about how new girls can't participate because they don't have enough boys.
This is not an issue for me as we wouldn't be doing it regardless, but it does make me pause and wonder: How does thing remain so popular and yet so totally frozen in amber? I have so many questions... If you are sending your young adolescents, do you worry about how alienating it may feel to LGBTQ adolescents who aren't "out" yet, and how do you handle that?
The website says "While we embrace tradition and the importance it plays in our society, we believe that keeping current with the needs of today’s youth is equally important. We prepare our students with social skills for the “elite experience” without promoting the elitist paradigm of the past."
The fact that they won't deviate from their 50-50 gender ratio just seems AWFULLY out of step. Can someone explain why someone can't do something more inclusive? There are plenty of ballroom dancing studios that manage to do better ....
(Also, a little more snarky now: How DOES "the elite experience" differs from "the elitist paradigm of the past"? Anyone able to explain?)
you sound like a jerk. if you don't want cotillion for your kids, that's great, but no need to dump on the families who like it. try to be more tolerant and perhaps get a life?
Anonymous wrote:They learn manners. That can't be bad. Isn't a LGBTQ issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cotillion is a part of traditional society. If a family finds it valuable and is invited, then go. If a family decides it is not valuable, then skip.
Make whichever choice makes sense for your family's situation, but either way one should expect any cotillion to be fairly traditional culturally.
I sure wish someone would come up with something a little more 21st century, because GOODNESS kids need so.much.help with etiquette and social skills and it's such a shame that you would limit participation based on BALLROOM DANCING RATIOS.
What about an etiquette class?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They learn manners. That can't be bad. Isn't a LGBTQ issue
It is if the idea of girls dancing with other girls is so scary that they'd rather exclude girls who want to participate.
This is a little too glib. When you learn to dance, you learn the steps based on whether you lead or follow. Learning both is an advanced skill, and you don't usually learn both at the same time. Especially in a once-a-month class for kids where dancing is only part of the program: there's just not time for that level of dance instruction.
So if girls are dancing with other girls, one of them is learning to lead. I would not assume that a gay girl, even if out, necessarily wants to learn to lead. It would be very weird to put that pressure on her to choose. And a straight girl presumably does not want to learn to lead.
What you want is a cotillion class that doesn't include ballroom dancing.
Anonymous wrote:Just transitioned from public to private for middle school, where half the grade is doing Capital Cotillion, and there is general consternation about how new girls can't participate because they don't have enough boys.
This is not an issue for me as we wouldn't be doing it regardless, but it does make me pause and wonder: How does thing remain so popular and yet so totally frozen in amber? I have so many questions... If you are sending your young adolescents, do you worry about how alienating it may feel to LGBTQ adolescents who aren't "out" yet, and how do you handle that?
The website says "While we embrace tradition and the importance it plays in our society, we believe that keeping current with the needs of today’s youth is equally important. We prepare our students with social skills for the “elite experience” without promoting the elitist paradigm of the past."
The fact that they won't deviate from their 50-50 gender ratio just seems AWFULLY out of step. Can someone explain why someone can't do something more inclusive? There are plenty of ballroom dancing studios that manage to do better ....
(Also, a little more snarky now: How DOES "the elite experience" differs from "the elitist paradigm of the past"? Anyone able to explain?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sent DD last year and I thought it was worthwhile. We talked about the gender stuff with DD at home, because it is old fashioned, but I also think there's value in knowing the traditional behavior that many people practice and expect, and that includes some gendered etiquette.
As a small example, I'm a woman and will hold the door for people around me. But I work with several men who will move to get the door or let me exit first, and there's value in knowing how to gracefully accept that courtesy instead of being surprised or awkward about it. And someone being gay does not alter the social expectation around who gets the door.
If you need to pay some organization a bunch of money to learn how to go through a door someone is holding, that’s the least of your problems. Christ almighty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They learn manners. That can't be bad. Isn't a LGBTQ issue
It is if the idea of girls dancing with other girls is so scary that they'd rather exclude girls who want to participate.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't knock it or assume stereotypes if your kid hasn't actually attended. Last year they were begging for more girls in 6th grade, so I think the numbers fluctuate. My dd signed up late when they sent out more emails asking for more girls to get some boys off the wl.
A few of my kids have participated over the years, and I found it more to be about manners, interacting with appropriate manners to adults, writing correct thank you notes, good eye contact, table manners, etc. They also learn more classical dances which have come in handy for my older kids in attending weddings, more formal dances, etc.
Anonymous wrote:I sent DD last year and I thought it was worthwhile. We talked about the gender stuff with DD at home, because it is old fashioned, but I also think there's value in knowing the traditional behavior that many people practice and expect, and that includes some gendered etiquette.
As a small example, I'm a woman and will hold the door for people around me. But I work with several men who will move to get the door or let me exit first, and there's value in knowing how to gracefully accept that courtesy instead of being surprised or awkward about it. And someone being gay does not alter the social expectation around who gets the door.