Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Background: High school that offers both IBDP and many AP courses. I have 2 kids that graduated with IB diplomas.
College acceptances do not vary among the students. IB does not give an edge if you are already taking a rigorous courseload.
It may differ by school, but I agree with the teacher above. TOK is universally hated and viewed as pointless. Kids who care about education would rather take another class. And one of my kids loves philosophy/is a philosophy major. Hated TOK.
It prepares students for college writing and research better than AP courses.
My personal opinion is that it is not as good for STEM. Both my kids took HL level sciences. I thought Bio was rigorous, but by taking a 2 year bio class, students often skipped physics or doubled up on science (which can be tough given HS requirements) or took over the summer. HL physics (at least the one offered at our school) is not calc based.
This.
If you opt for diploma then you’re saddled with TOK, community activity and extended essay, when instead you could be taking real courses that align with your interests. Two years for an advanced course is too long, and I don’t think there are many students that can handle an HL/AP level class over the summer. IB HL Physics is indeed not calculus based and it’s not that useful for kids interested in engineering majors.
I’d skip IBDP to take more rigorous classes, either more HL, AP or for math DE.
It really does depend on your student. These classes and requirements termed a chore by this poster, were beneficial and enjoyable to my student.
Look at the course content and ask around about the teachers and I think your student can make a determination if it aligns with their interests.
I would add that the writing requirements are challenging. It is difficult to produce a good piece of writing but it is a skill that only improves with practice. It is very good preparation for college work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Background: High school that offers both IBDP and many AP courses. I have 2 kids that graduated with IB diplomas.
College acceptances do not vary among the students. IB does not give an edge if you are already taking a rigorous courseload.
It may differ by school, but I agree with the teacher above. TOK is universally hated and viewed as pointless. Kids who care about education would rather take another class. And one of my kids loves philosophy/is a philosophy major. Hated TOK.
It prepares students for college writing and research better than AP courses.
My personal opinion is that it is not as good for STEM. Both my kids took HL level sciences. I thought Bio was rigorous, but by taking a 2 year bio class, students often skipped physics or doubled up on science (which can be tough given HS requirements) or took over the summer. HL physics (at least the one offered at our school) is not calc based.
This.
If you opt for diploma then you’re saddled with TOK, community activity and extended essay, when instead you could be taking real courses that align with your interests. Two years for an advanced course is too long, and I don’t think there are many students that can handle an HL/AP level class over the summer. IB HL Physics is indeed not calculus based and it’s not that useful for kids interested in engineering majors.
I’d skip IBDP to take more rigorous classes, either more HL, AP or for math DE.
I don't know what this means. IBDP requires at least 3 HL classes, many of which straddle 2 years. Also, in some schools (like my kid's), the IBDP path includes AP courses starting from 9th grade.
The IBDP really doesn't start until 11th grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Background: High school that offers both IBDP and many AP courses. I have 2 kids that graduated with IB diplomas.
College acceptances do not vary among the students. IB does not give an edge if you are already taking a rigorous courseload.
It may differ by school, but I agree with the teacher above. TOK is universally hated and viewed as pointless. Kids who care about education would rather take another class. And one of my kids loves philosophy/is a philosophy major. Hated TOK.
It prepares students for college writing and research better than AP courses.
My personal opinion is that it is not as good for STEM. Both my kids took HL level sciences. I thought Bio was rigorous, but by taking a 2 year bio class, students often skipped physics or doubled up on science (which can be tough given HS requirements) or took over the summer. HL physics (at least the one offered at our school) is not calc based.
This.
If you opt for diploma then you’re saddled with TOK, community activity and extended essay, when instead you could be taking real courses that align with your interests. Two years for an advanced course is too long, and I don’t think there are many students that can handle an HL/AP level class over the summer. IB HL Physics is indeed not calculus based and it’s not that useful for kids interested in engineering majors.
I’d skip IBDP to take more rigorous classes, either more HL, AP or for math DE.
It really does depend on your student. These classes and requirements termed a chore by this poster, were beneficial and enjoyable to my student.
Look at the course content and ask around about the teachers and I think your student can make a determination if it aligns with their interests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Background: High school that offers both IBDP and many AP courses. I have 2 kids that graduated with IB diplomas.
College acceptances do not vary among the students. IB does not give an edge if you are already taking a rigorous courseload.
It may differ by school, but I agree with the teacher above. TOK is universally hated and viewed as pointless. Kids who care about education would rather take another class. And one of my kids loves philosophy/is a philosophy major. Hated TOK.
It prepares students for college writing and research better than AP courses.
My personal opinion is that it is not as good for STEM. Both my kids took HL level sciences. I thought Bio was rigorous, but by taking a 2 year bio class, students often skipped physics or doubled up on science (which can be tough given HS requirements) or took over the summer. HL physics (at least the one offered at our school) is not calc based.
This.
If you opt for diploma then you’re saddled with TOK, community activity and extended essay, when instead you could be taking real courses that align with your interests. Two years for an advanced course is too long, and I don’t think there are many students that can handle an HL/AP level class over the summer. IB HL Physics is indeed not calculus based and it’s not that useful for kids interested in engineering majors.
I’d skip IBDP to take more rigorous classes, either more HL, AP or for math DE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Background: High school that offers both IBDP and many AP courses. I have 2 kids that graduated with IB diplomas.
College acceptances do not vary among the students. IB does not give an edge if you are already taking a rigorous courseload.
It may differ by school, but I agree with the teacher above. TOK is universally hated and viewed as pointless. Kids who care about education would rather take another class. And one of my kids loves philosophy/is a philosophy major. Hated TOK.
It prepares students for college writing and research better than AP courses.
My personal opinion is that it is not as good for STEM. Both my kids took HL level sciences. I thought Bio was rigorous, but by taking a 2 year bio class, students often skipped physics or doubled up on science (which can be tough given HS requirements) or took over the summer. HL physics (at least the one offered at our school) is not calc based.
This.
If you opt for diploma then you’re saddled with TOK, community activity and extended essay, when instead you could be taking real courses that align with your interests. Two years for an advanced course is too long, and I don’t think there are many students that can handle an HL/AP level class over the summer. IB HL Physics is indeed not calculus based and it’s not that useful for kids interested in engineering majors.
I’d skip IBDP to take more rigorous classes, either more HL, AP or for math DE.
Anonymous wrote:A friend of mine works at a top-25 college admissions office. When my child was looking at HS, one of them was an IB school, and I knew nothing about it so I asked her. She said admissions offices look very highly on kids in the IB Diploma Program. True, you don't get the diploma until after you've already graduated, finished the application process, etc. But she said it showed the admissions that the student could handle academic rigor
Anonymous wrote:Background: High school that offers both IBDP and many AP courses. I have 2 kids that graduated with IB diplomas.
College acceptances do not vary among the students. IB does not give an edge if you are already taking a rigorous courseload.
It may differ by school, but I agree with the teacher above. TOK is universally hated and viewed as pointless. Kids who care about education would rather take another class. And one of my kids loves philosophy/is a philosophy major. Hated TOK.
It prepares students for college writing and research better than AP courses.
My personal opinion is that it is not as good for STEM. Both my kids took HL level sciences. I thought Bio was rigorous, but by taking a 2 year bio class, students often skipped physics or doubled up on science (which can be tough given HS requirements) or took over the summer. HL physics (at least the one offered at our school) is not calc based.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parent of kids whose school offers both IB and many APs. They only school I've heard it matters for is UVA. It's very difficult to get in from our school if you are not full IB. The only ones I know of were wait listed first. On the other had I know kids at Ivies and top LACs (e.g., Williams) who did not do the full IB diploma.
At our public, the full IB diploma candidates are the ones that go to the ivys and other top colleges unless they are athletic recruits.
Anonymous wrote:Parent of kids whose school offers both IB and many APs. They only school I've heard it matters for is UVA. It's very difficult to get in from our school if you are not full IB. The only ones I know of were wait listed first. On the other had I know kids at Ivies and top LACs (e.g., Williams) who did not do the full IB diploma.
Anonymous wrote:Parent of kids whose school offers both IB and many APs. They only school I've heard it matters for is UVA. It's very difficult to get in from our school if you are not full IB. The only ones I know of were wait listed first. On the other had I know kids at Ivies and top LACs (e.g., Williams) who did not do the full IB diploma.