Anonymous wrote:Enthusiastic Williams grad but I thought Middlebury and Wesleyan were better fits for my kid within the NESCAC along with Davidson and Carleton. Don’t get blinded by the WASP label. Focus on the fit.
Anonymous wrote:I would never apply ED to a LAC. Too few non-athlete/non-FGLI seats left for unhooked.
Better off EDing to something that's at least mid-sized (U Chicago, WashU, Vandy, Cornell, Emory, etc.)
Anonymous wrote:I would not ED to any unless I'd visited and truly fallen in love. My unhooked kid was accepted to Swat RD. We had visited.junior.year and she really thought she wanted to go. But when we visited for Swatstruck (accepted student day) she realized it was not for her. Polling DCUM is not the way to pick one of these schools
Anonymous wrote:Amherst has become the most "woke" of the batch. And I'm saying this as a left-of-center moderate Democrat who thinks that some diversity is a good thing, but Amherst has gone a bit overboard with DEI and virtue-signaling. The other schools are definitely left and far from MAGA, but it is less in your face. Amherst is not Oberlin or something like that, and a more moderate, less political kid will be fine there. But it has definitely become a bigger part of the culture.
None of this is necessarily a bad thing. Different strokes for different folks. Just need to know what you are getting into.
Anonymous wrote:Amherst has become the most "woke" of the batch. And I'm saying this as a left-of-center moderate Democrat who thinks that some diversity is a good thing, but Amherst has gone a bit overboard with DEI and virtue-signaling. The other schools are definitely left and far from MAGA, but it is less in your face. Amherst is not Oberlin or something like that, and a more moderate, less political kid will be fine there. But it has definitely become a bigger part of the culture.
None of this is necessarily a bad thing. Different strokes for different folks. Just need to know what you are getting into.