Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a grand jury’s job to rubber stamp every DOJ case. If they are refusing to indict it’s because the new hand-picked MAGA DOJ attorneys are not proving sufficient grounds. Pam Bondi is poorly qualified for the job, given how she screwed up the #EpsteinFiles that’s obvious.

Is there anyone remaining with the DOJ that is qualified?

I feel like the sandwich guy was the last one.

No. Apparently, they fired the really talented attorneys and only the crackpots without experience are there. DCs public defender's office is the best in the nation. Now, you have really bad lawyers in the US Attorneys office and really good lawyers everywhere else. The grand juries are not indicting because the US Atty keeps overcharging or charging based on illegal police work.

She should get six months in jail. Threats made against the both Barrack and Michelle Obama by different people were given six months in jail.

I think instead of jail, they need to go to St. Elizabeth's for evaluation and kept there.

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

Bookmarking this post for the next time someone threatens to kill a Democrat on social media. We won't see pages and pages of outraged Democrats calling for this person's arrest - right?

Anonymous wrote:"First even politicized DOJ" is laughable. nobody believes this garbage.

+100
Amazing how short OP's memory is, not to mention all the dolts agreeing with her.

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a grand jury’s job to rubber stamp every DOJ case. If they are refusing to indict it’s because the new hand-picked MAGA DOJ attorneys are not proving sufficient grounds. Pam Bondi is poorly qualified for the job, given how she screwed up the #EpsteinFiles that’s obvious.

Is there anyone remaining with the DOJ that is qualified?

I feel like the sandwich guy was the last one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

She belongs in a mental institution not jail. Her post was undeniably deranged. Credible evidence she’s a schizophrenic and I think that’s now what DOJ is pursuing. Frankly indicting her would just have prolonged the process as she would have ended up there anyway.

Oh, so we are putting people in mental institutions because you don’t like their speech? Oh boy, there are going to be a LOT of MAGAs in the looney bin. Start with the people sending pizzas to judges and work your way to the J6 folks, that were pardoned for ACTUAL ACTS OF VIOLENCE.

It’s not a grand jury’s job to rubber stamp every DOJ case. If they are refusing to indict it’s because the new hand-picked MAGA DOJ attorneys are not proving sufficient grounds. Pam Bondi is poorly qualified for the job, given how she screwed up the #EpsteinFiles that’s obvious.

Are you one of those functional alcoholics?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ*.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

Have you ever picked up a US history book in your life.

*in the modern era.

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

She belongs in a mental institution not jail. Her post was undeniably deranged. Credible evidence she’s a schizophrenic and I think that’s now what DOJ is pursuing. Frankly indicting her would just have prolonged the process as she would have ended up there anyway.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

Republicans say these type of things every day about democrats.

Not to mention giving military honors funeral to Republican that broke into Capitol building to kill the VP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

It's sad that you think criminals whose behavior results in innocent victims' deaths shouldn't receive meaningful consequences for their actions.

Huh? None of the non-indicted killed anybody, weirdo.

Did an Uber driver die? Carjackers get punished?

That is unrelated to this thread, but those young girls plead guilty to murder and were sentenced to maximum jail time, so not really on point here.

But the maximum was very few years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

.

Agree the woman’s post was appalling but apparently there was no evidence to show intention beyond the disgusting post.

PP you replied to. Well, as long as we're willing to treat someone who threatens Democratic Presidents in the same way, I'm good. If it's just words and no intent, OK. I feel like she should have had a fine or something. For mouthing off

Pretty sure people have said such things about presidents from both parties without being prosecuted.

Anonymous wrote:Her words were terrifying, OP. She said she was willing to disembowel the President and cut his trachea. She should not get a pass. These words are unacceptable.

However, I believe the recent failures to indict are due to Prosecutorial over-reach.

Republicans say these type of things every day about democrats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Makes me proud to be a Washingtonian - a people unwilling to allow indictments for improper charges of exaggerated crimes. A populace that understands the nuances of the legal process and refuses to be tool of the first-ever-politicized-DOJ.

Heartening to see the grand jury process working exactly as it was designed, a check on prosecutorial
overreach.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/d-c-grand-jury-reject-justice-dept-indictment-requests/

It's sad that you think criminals whose behavior results in innocent victims' deaths shouldn't receive meaningful consequences for their actions.

Huh? None of the non-indicted killed anybody, weirdo.

Did an Uber driver die? Carjackers get punished?

That is unrelated to this thread, but those young girls plead guilty to murder and were sentenced to maximum jail time, so not really on point here.