Anonymous
09/04/2025 10:41
Subject: USA Cycling limits Women’s category to women-only
Anonymous wrote:People always think this will hurt transwomen. It will, inevitably, harm ciswomen who can't "prove" they're women without something very, very invasive happening. By making you think they're going after trans folks, they will make biological women suffer.
can’t they just do a simple cheek swab ?
Anonymous
09/03/2025 05:49
Subject: USA Cycling limits Women’s category to women-only
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People always think this will hurt transwomen. It will, inevitably, harm ciswomen who can't "prove" they're women without something very, very invasive happening. By making you think they're going after trans folks, they will make biological women suffer.
If there is truly some question, a cheek swab will cover it.
The rule clearly states that they are not dividing based on chromosomes, they are choosing sex assigned at birth as the criteria.
Then the point I was responding to is moot.
Anonymous
09/03/2025 04:49
Subject: USA Cycling limits Women’s category to women-only
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People always think this will hurt transwomen. It will, inevitably, harm ciswomen who can't "prove" they're women without something very, very invasive happening. By making you think they're going after trans folks, they will make biological women suffer.
If there is truly some question, a cheek swab will cover it.
The rule clearly states that they are not dividing based on chromosomes, they are choosing sex assigned at birth as the criteria.