Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re: forgetting -- I don't necessarily think that's a lie. It's just a way to say in the moment her impulse to text a friend something exciting overtook what she knows as the rule. That's the very nature of ADHD. It doesn't mean she couldn't have told you the rule right then if she had been asked.
If you know ADHD affects her ability to behave appropriately, why have you given her unrestricted access to a smart phone?
My middle schooler doesn't have ADHD and her phone becomes a brick during the school day. Texting isn't an option. You are glossing over your responsibility as a parent to give her freedoms incrementally as she shows she can handle them. Basically, you're a lazy parent.
I wasn't the OP. I'm simply not so sure it was lying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re: forgetting -- I don't necessarily think that's a lie. It's just a way to say in the moment her impulse to text a friend something exciting overtook what she knows as the rule. That's the very nature of ADHD. It doesn't mean she couldn't have told you the rule right then if she had been asked.
If you know ADHD affects her ability to behave appropriately, why have you given her unrestricted access to a smart phone?
My middle schooler doesn't have ADHD and her phone becomes a brick during the school day. Texting isn't an option. You are glossing over your responsibility as a parent to give her freedoms incrementally as she shows she can handle them. Basically, you're a lazy parent.
Anonymous wrote:Re: forgetting -- I don't necessarily think that's a lie. It's just a way to say in the moment her impulse to text a friend something exciting overtook what she knows as the rule. That's the very nature of ADHD. It doesn't mean she couldn't have told you the rule right then if she had been asked.
Anonymous wrote:Re: forgetting -- I don't necessarily think that's a lie. It's just a way to say in the moment her impulse to text a friend something exciting overtook what she knows as the rule. That's the very nature of ADHD. It doesn't mean she couldn't have told you the rule right then if she had been asked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would want to see the policy that allows ISS for the first instance of insubordination and what the cell phone policy says about the refusal. If those policies are unclear, I agree with your husband on fighting it. It seems like a double whammy for essentially one issue to me.
The kid broke the known phone rule (she didn’t forget) and was disrespectful to the AP when she was told to turn the phone over for the rest of the day. You are part of the problem if you fight the consequences for those actions.
My read of the rules at our school is parents would be called first and/or detention. ISS to me reads as a possible overreaction/the administration acting on a whim because they're offended she was disrespectful. Respect goes both ways and includes the school following their own policies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would want to see the policy that allows ISS for the first instance of insubordination and what the cell phone policy says about the refusal. If those policies are unclear, I agree with your husband on fighting it. It seems like a double whammy for essentially one issue to me.
The kid broke the known phone rule (she didn’t forget) and was disrespectful to the AP when she was told to turn the phone over for the rest of the day. You are part of the problem if you fight the consequences for those actions.
My read of the rules at our school is parents would be called first and/or detention. ISS to me reads as a possible overreaction/the administration acting on a whim because they're offended she was disrespectful. Respect goes both ways and includes the school following their own policies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would want to see the policy that allows ISS for the first instance of insubordination and what the cell phone policy says about the refusal. If those policies are unclear, I agree with your husband on fighting it. It seems like a double whammy for essentially one issue to me.
The kid broke the known phone rule (she didn’t forget) and was disrespectful to the AP when she was told to turn the phone over for the rest of the day. You are part of the problem if you fight the consequences for those actions.
Anonymous wrote:I would want to see the policy that allows ISS for the first instance of insubordination and what the cell phone policy says about the refusal. If those policies are unclear, I agree with your husband on fighting it. It seems like a double whammy for essentially one issue to me.
Anonymous wrote:Id be more concerned about screen addiction or what’s so important on her phone that she didn’t want to give it up. Limit phone time to one hour a day and she cannot have it in a bedroom and it gets charged overnight in your room or somewhere she can’t access. Install Bark (it’s an app) on the phone, looks for sensitive information and sends to parents. She needs boundaries and will thrive if you put them in place. Short term pain-long term gain. Pediatric psych nurse practitioner