Anonymous wrote:These townhomes are just a few. Locks from king st. One is for sale right now -
https://www.redfin.com/VA/Alexandria/522-N-Royal-St-22314/home/11877175
Anonymous wrote:These townhomes are just a few. Locks from king st. One is for sale right now -
https://www.redfin.com/VA/Alexandria/522-N-Royal-St-22314/home/11877175
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think public housing leadership should be required to live in the different units as a condition of keeping the job. Yes, it would take out a unit for someone who doesn’t have other options. But it would absolutely improve conditions for everyone who is in if the leader had some skin in the game.
And they should be required to live in the dodgier ones. The ones that need improving.
He was living in the nicest ones in Alexandria, a regular multistory townhome that is in the middle of a regular $1-2million TH complex. It was a section 8 unit in a market rate development. It’s was not in regular section 8 housing, like the ones by Braddock metro or off of Rt 1. This was deliberate.
Nope. Just luck of the draw. Completely coincidental.
This literally is illegal, and on a federal level. The FBI can arrest him for misappropriation of HUD funds. It's not even a grey area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think public housing leadership should be required to live in the different units as a condition of keeping the job. Yes, it would take out a unit for someone who doesn’t have other options. But it would absolutely improve conditions for everyone who is in if the leader had some skin in the game.
And they should be required to live in the dodgier ones. The ones that need improving.
He was living in the nicest ones in Alexandria, a regular multistory townhome that is in the middle of a regular $1-2million TH complex. It was a section 8 unit in a market rate development. It’s was not in regular section 8 housing, like the ones by Braddock metro or off of Rt 1. This was deliberate.
Nope. Just luck of the draw. Completely coincidental.
This literally is illegal, and on a federal level. The FBI can arrest him for misappropriation of HUD funds. It's not even a grey area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think public housing leadership should be required to live in the different units as a condition of keeping the job. Yes, it would take out a unit for someone who doesn’t have other options. But it would absolutely improve conditions for everyone who is in if the leader had some skin in the game.
And they should be required to live in the dodgier ones. The ones that need improving.
He was living in the nicest ones in Alexandria, a regular multistory townhome that is in the middle of a regular $1-2million TH complex. It was a section 8 unit in a market rate development. It’s was not in regular section 8 housing, like the ones by Braddock metro or off of Rt 1. This was deliberate.
Nope. Just luck of the draw. Completely coincidental.
This literally is illegal, and on a federal level. The FBI can arrest him for misappropriation of HUD funds. It's not even a grey area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think public housing leadership should be required to live in the different units as a condition of keeping the job. Yes, it would take out a unit for someone who doesn’t have other options. But it would absolutely improve conditions for everyone who is in if the leader had some skin in the game.
And they should be required to live in the dodgier ones. The ones that need improving.
He was living in the nicest ones in Alexandria, a regular multistory townhome that is in the middle of a regular $1-2million TH complex. It was a section 8 unit in a market rate development. It’s was not in regular section 8 housing, like the ones by Braddock metro or off of Rt 1. This was deliberate.
Nope. Just luck of the draw. Completely coincidental.
Anonymous wrote:AND he still has his job. Good old city of Alexandria!
It's astounding. The city doesn't even try to hide their bs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think public housing leadership should be required to live in the different units as a condition of keeping the job. Yes, it would take out a unit for someone who doesn’t have other options. But it would absolutely improve conditions for everyone who is in if the leader had some skin in the game.
And they should be required to live in the dodgier ones. The ones that need improving.
He was living in the nicest ones in Alexandria, a regular multistory townhome that is in the middle of a regular $1-2million TH complex. It was a section 8 unit in a market rate development. It’s was not in regular section 8 housing, like the ones by Braddock metro or off of Rt 1. This was deliberate.
Nope. Just luck of the draw. Completely coincidental.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think public housing leadership should be required to live in the different units as a condition of keeping the job. Yes, it would take out a unit for someone who doesn’t have other options. But it would absolutely improve conditions for everyone who is in if the leader had some skin in the game.
And they should be required to live in the dodgier ones. The ones that need improving.
He was living in the nicest ones in Alexandria, a regular multistory townhome that is in the middle of a regular $1-2million TH complex. It was a section 8 unit in a market rate development. It’s was not in regular section 8 housing, like the ones by Braddock metro or off of Rt 1. This was deliberate.
Nope. Just luck of the draw. Completely coincidental.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I think public housing leadership should be required to live in the different units as a condition of keeping the job. Yes, it would take out a unit for someone who doesn’t have other options. But it would absolutely improve conditions for everyone who is in if the leader had some skin in the game.
And they should be required to live in the dodgier ones. The ones that need improving.
Exactly. It’d be well worth the cost to have them move every 2-3 years to make sure all of the buildings are getting attention. Go in alphabetical order and if one leaves, the next picks up at the next building on the list.
IDK if you can do this without some extra hazard pay or whatever that employees get who do not get to choose where and how to live. Because you are effectively making his life outside of working hours be dedicated to work, for which people are usually compensated. Like people who are military deployed or work on oil rigs or have to be live-in caretakers, etc, e.g. don't control their living conditions. It would have to be free housing to motivate people to do this and disclosed as part of a job.