Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friend had her first at 47 and is about to have her second at 50. If you're up to it, go for it. [e/quote]
Ummm what?
With reproductive assistance, lots of women are having babies in their 50s and even in their 60s. I'm not saying it's easy, but it has been done thousands of times (usually with donor eggs). It would be incredibly rare for a woman to have an unassisted conception and live birth at that age, but there are records of it happening. Understandably, nobody has access to a woman's fertility records so it's difficult to prove or disprove reproductive assistance.
Anonymous wrote:My friend had her first at 47 and is about to have her second at 50. If you're up to it, go for it. [e/quote]
Ummm what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I got a very late start to marriage and family. Married at 41 first baby at 43. DD was a surprise as we weren't exactly planning her but we have been happy . It now seems we may have a second on the way. Still need to confirm and I realize at my age it's likely that I won't go to term.
But if I do...I guess I need some reassurance with the possibility of having a 6 year old and a newborn at nearly 50 and DH at over 50.
You will be close to 70 when kid is 20.
Anonymous wrote:I got a very late start to marriage and family. Married at 41 first baby at 43. DD was a surprise as we weren't exactly planning her but we have been happy . It now seems we may have a second on the way. Still need to confirm and I realize at my age it's likely that I won't go to term.
But if I do...I guess I need some reassurance with the possibility of having a 6 year old and a newborn at nearly 50 and DH at over 50.
Anonymous wrote:People are being pretty unkind here.
All things are possible if you want them enough. Yes you will be tired but you can make it work if you want to.
I do think the odds are high of a miscarriage —I would mentally prepare for that. My family has lots of pregnancies in 40s, mostly unplanned. But nothing nearly as late as 48. There’s a huge difference between 43 and 48. (Question if you have ultra longevity in your family? The gene for ultralongevity — eg over 100–is associated with the gene for late pregnancies, which totally makes sense. Anyway if your grandparents lived over 100, that increases the odds you’ll be able to carry.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The odds are below 1%? Heck, at 35 I could no longer carry to term. My body killed literally every baby we made.
Don’t be a nasty cow. When I gave birth at GW at 39, I could see the first names and ages of all the admitted mothers written on the nursing station board. There were plenty in their 40s-all with babies. You’ll find plenty of “geriatric moms” in the DC area.
Anonymous wrote:My mom had my two youngest siblings at ages 43 and 47. It was fine. Healthy babies, etc.