Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hopefully your private school has great LA classes, so your children don't write subjects with "like" in them.
Was this written by AI? Please do share what’s wrong with using the word “like” when comparing one thing to another?
You don't get to stick your nose in the air and utterly profundities like, "Is nonpublic education comparable to furnishing your offspring with organic produce to fulfill their nutritional needs?"
Then you get to feel REALLY superior all day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of silly analogy. We are moving to private. I am aware of the research that says private doesn't necessarily make a notable difference in academic outcomes. Ditto small class sizes. And yet, it feels like there's some intangible benefit and that the process to get from point A to point B is just...nicer and more lovely in private. Actually, it is tangible. At the end of the day, my kids may end up attending state schools, or the same schools they would have attended if we stayed in public. They're bright, and would do well in whatever setting. (Part of the move to private is for my own sanity--I did a lot of supplementing when they were in public, and decided it's worth it to just do less supplementing and put them in private) Still, I feel some ambivalence as someone who benefited from public schools growing up. That said, I know the public of 2025 is not the public of 1980s/90s.
It makes me think of how most of us grew up eating regular, non-organic fruit. I don't think I knew organic fruit existed till I was like...25? And we're fine. But we prefer to feed our kid organic when it's available and accessible/not exorbitantly priced. Is it that much better for our kids to eat organic? Hard to tell. But it feels better as a parent, to give them that. (Similar analogies would be the "difference" between breastfeeding and formula--which I think is really minimal though when I had newborns it felt like life/death, and between flying coach vs first class...everyone gets to the same place, but boy is first class nice, esp on a long flight.)
But, you will actually have to do as much supplementing (if not more) in private. Curriculum, pedagogy and teacher qualification in even worse than public.
What privates are great for - smaller classrooms, richer demographics, less discipline issues, more expensive ECs like horseriding, rowing. What they are worse for - STEM, curriculum.
So, it is like you decided to eat organic onions and potatoes...but you are buying all your berries and greens from non-organic sources, and your protein from Aldis and Lidl.
Anonymous wrote:✈️
Public school is coach.
Private school is business class.
Homeschool is first class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hopefully your private school has great LA classes, so your children don't write subjects with "like" in them.
Was this written by AI? Please do share what’s wrong with using the word “like” when comparing one thing to another?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I laughed at the part where you said you didn't want to supplement anymore. Get ready.
Sigh yeah, I know. (OP here) But not as much as public, fingers crossed.
I like Aldi, I like Whole Foods...putting it all together = well-balanced diet. Can't knock Aldi, esp when they put out all of the German food around Oktoberfest.
That said, maybe first class vs coach makes more sense. Our public is not terrible, but private is a more pleasant ride.
Anonymous wrote:Hopefully your private school has great LA classes, so your children don't write subjects with "like" in them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of silly analogy. We are moving to private. I am aware of the research that says private doesn't necessarily make a notable difference in academic outcomes. Ditto small class sizes. And yet, it feels like there's some intangible benefit and that the process to get from point A to point B is just...nicer and more lovely in private. Actually, it is tangible. At the end of the day, my kids may end up attending state schools, or the same schools they would have attended if we stayed in public. They're bright, and would do well in whatever setting. (Part of the move to private is for my own sanity--I did a lot of supplementing when they were in public, and decided it's worth it to just do less supplementing and put them in private) Still, I feel some ambivalence as someone who benefited from public schools growing up. That said, I know the public of 2025 is not the public of 1980s/90s.
It makes me think of how most of us grew up eating regular, non-organic fruit. I don't think I knew organic fruit existed till I was like...25? And we're fine. But we prefer to feed our kid organic when it's available and accessible/not exorbitantly priced. Is it that much better for our kids to eat organic? Hard to tell. But it feels better as a parent, to give them that. (Similar analogies would be the "difference" between breastfeeding and formula--which I think is really minimal though when I had newborns it felt like life/death, and between flying coach vs first class...everyone gets to the same place, but boy is first class nice, esp on a long flight.)
But, you will actually have to do as much supplementing (if not more) in private.
Anonymous wrote:The largest class i taught last year was fifteen students. At public schools, the number is closer to 30. That's one of major benefits of private school.
Anonymous wrote:I laughed at the part where you said you didn't want to supplement anymore. Get ready.