Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a faculty member/chair at a STEM-focused university. From the perspective of the Trump Administration, DEI does include women. We have received guidance from the DOE and DOJ that includes gender within the context of federally-funded grants, admissions programs that consider gender (e.g., recruiting, scholarships, etc.), hiring initiatives, and leadership programs.
Not in the context of college admissions. Girls outperform boys by a mile in colleges.
Higher up in academic settings, yes, women are being discriminated still. Fewer female professors in colleges, even fewer in leadership positions. But I think these positions are currently occupied by a lot of aged male professors, they will be gone in a few years by force of nature. I wouldn't worried too much about DEI for women.
That is not entirely true. Admissions is broader than AO's making decisions about denial/acceptance. I was referring to admissions practices around recruitment/marketing and merit scholarships. For example, we have received guidance that recruitment efforts to increase the number of female applicants in STEM falls under DEI or scholarship earmarked for women-only.
You missed the main point: Girls outperform boys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a faculty member/chair at a STEM-focused university. From the perspective of the Trump Administration, DEI does include women. We have received guidance from the DOE and DOJ that includes gender within the context of federally-funded grants, admissions programs that consider gender (e.g., recruiting, scholarships, etc.), hiring initiatives, and leadership programs.
Not in the context of college admissions. Girls outperform boys by a mile in colleges.
Higher up in academic settings, yes, women are being discriminated still. Fewer female professors in colleges, even fewer in leadership positions. But I think these positions are currently occupied by a lot of aged male professors, they will be gone in a few years by force of nature. I wouldn't worried too much about DEI for women.
That is not entirely true. Admissions is broader than AO's making decisions about denial/acceptance. I was referring to admissions practices around recruitment/marketing and merit scholarships. For example, we have received guidance that recruitment efforts to increase the number of female applicants in STEM falls under DEI or scholarship earmarked for women-only.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a faculty member/chair at a STEM-focused university. From the perspective of the Trump Administration, DEI does include women. We have received guidance from the DOE and DOJ that includes gender within the context of federally-funded grants, admissions programs that consider gender (e.g., recruiting, scholarships, etc.), hiring initiatives, and leadership programs.
Not in the context of college admissions. Girls outperform boys by a mile in colleges.
Higher up in academic settings, yes, women are being discriminated still. Fewer female professors in colleges, even fewer in leadership positions. But I think these positions are currently occupied by a lot of aged male professors, they will be gone in a few years by force of nature. I wouldn't worried too much about DEI for women.
Anonymous wrote:DEI helps everyone. It hurts exactly no one.
Anonymous wrote:I am a faculty member/chair at a STEM-focused university. From the perspective of the Trump Administration, DEI does include women. We have received guidance from the DOE and DOJ that includes gender within the context of federally-funded grants, admissions programs that consider gender (e.g., recruiting, scholarships, etc.), hiring initiatives, and leadership programs.
Anonymous wrote:Help me out here, but from what I have read, the DEI policies seem to be regarding race and not much talk about gender. The only gender issues regarding admission I have seen related to transgender in sports.
So are the new DEI policies related to race or gender? We know that some schools in the past, particularly the Ivies, balance gender as close to 50-50 as possible. I am not certain this is changing going forward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In college admissions, DEI only refers to race. There is actually affirmative action for boys at most colleges.
DEI in college admissions also doesn’t help those with disabilities, who are usually advised to not mention disabilities in essays, etc.
The first point is untrue. Most schools are consistent in the gender balance among the total applicant pool, the admitted applicants, and the enrolled students. Most have more women than men in each of those categories.
I'm the PP. I'm simply reporting what several AO's said in interviews that I listened to recently. At a lot of schools boys who are admitted have lower stats than the girls admitted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In college admissions, DEI only refers to race. There is actually affirmative action for boys at most colleges.
DEI in college admissions also doesn’t help those with disabilities, who are usually advised to not mention disabilities in essays, etc.
The first point is untrue. Most schools are consistent in the gender balance among the total applicant pool, the admitted applicants, and the enrolled students. Most have more women than men in each of those categories.