Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of threads in this forum that tout HYPSM and denigrate other elite schools as “Ivy rejects,” much to the protest of parents and students at other elite schools. What’s going on here?
First, it’s not about smarts. Every school among the Top 25 universities and Top 15 liberal arts colleges have a very similar academic profile.
It is about two other variables:
1) dispositional intensity - HYPSM are looking for hyper-driven, highly competitive people who believe that worldly success/legacy is existential. Other elite schools, particularly those outside the NE, are looking for more balanced students that value Midwestern Southern or non-tech/SV Western values of hospitality, humility, and enjoyment of life.
2) regional cultural differences - HYPSM
draws heavily from the Northeast, elite private high schools and global strivers. Amongst these groups, prestige awareness and achievement stacking is essential for external validation. For other elite schools that draw heavily from the South, Midwest, or non-tech West, ambition is more subtle, relational and not existential.
When the Ivy-or-bust group deride your kid’s choice as an “Ivy reject,” what they’re really saying is that you’re soft, not hardcore, like them. They want to be a Supreme Court justice; you want to be a local trust and estate lawyer. They want to create Facebook; you want to work at Facebook and get a stock grant.
While many would be tempted to applaud the world-changing desire of HYPSM, I’m not always impressed. First, much of what’s counted as an “advancement” is just incremental improvements on existing human habits. Second, much of this worldly success is privatized (think hedge funds and their ilk). Third, in the worst cases, crazy ambition leads to the breaking of social and institutional norms where society shoulders the consequences. In contrast, hometown doctors, lawyers, educators, and small business leaders almost always benefit their communities.
Only you and your kid can decide what’s right for them. Not all smart kids belong at or will thrive at HPYSM. And, that’s a good thing. If everyone in society acted like the most ambitious, we’d kill each other for scraps.
Anonymous wrote:There is a difference in quality, what is taught, how it is taugt, and connections. Is the difference meaningful. Could be. May not be.
College is a launching pad. You can get a similar result from Towson as Harvard for a specific individual. But there may be more to take advantage of at Harvard. You may be challenged more. You may make more connections. All needed? No. But sure does not hurt. Also not everyone that went to Townson will come out the same as a top school.
The top schools give options that you cannot get anywhere else. Is there a difference among them? Sure but it gets smaller and smaller.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Name
I think Leland Stanford is a pretty ugly name.
Anonymous wrote:A good friend of mine went to Harvard, I went to a SLAC. A couple of things came up when we were in college:
1)in order to get into a class at Harvard with a famous prof, you had to apply for it. So, it was another level of competition
2) she was a “normal” smart girl but said it was intimidating because everyone else arrived so accomplished. Her roommate was a renowned violinist, her boyfriend was training to row in the Olympics. Everyone, it seemed had done or was doing something notable and it was intimidating.
3) comparing notes, it seemed like I had much more homework than her.
4) I was with her when we ran into a professor of mine, this was about 1-2 years post college. He remembered my name and my sister’s, who he had also taught. She was flabbergasted by this as she said it would never have happened with a Harvard professor.
Her son is now going to Harvard and she made him think long and hard about it. It certainly opened up many many doors for her, but tried to convey to him that’s it’s not necessarily the best college experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of threads in this forum that tout HYPSM and denigrate other elite schools as “Ivy rejects,” much to the protest of parents and students at other elite schools. What’s going on here?
First, it’s not about smarts. Every school among the Top 25 universities and Top 15 liberal arts colleges have a very similar academic profile.
It is about two other variables:
1) dispositional intensity - HYPSM are looking for hyper-driven, highly competitive people who believe that worldly success/legacy is existential. Other elite schools, particularly those outside the NE, are looking for more balanced students that value Midwestern Southern or non-tech/SV Western values of hospitality, humility, and enjoyment of life.
2) regional cultural differences - HYPSM
draws heavily from the Northeast, elite private high schools and global strivers. Amongst these groups, prestige awareness and achievement stacking is essential for external validation. For other elite schools that draw heavily from the South, Midwest, or non-tech West, ambition is more subtle, relational and not existential.
When the Ivy-or-bust group deride your kid’s choice as an “Ivy reject,” what they’re really saying is that you’re soft, not hardcore, like them. They want to be a Supreme Court justice; you want to be a local trust and estate lawyer. They want to create Facebook; you want to work at Facebook and get a stock grant.
While many would be tempted to applaud the world-changing desire of HYPSM, I’m not always impressed. First, much of what’s counted as an “advancement” is just incremental improvements on existing human habits. Second, much of this worldly success is privatized (think hedge funds and their ilk). Third, in the worst cases, crazy ambition leads to the breaking of social and institutional norms where society shoulders the consequences. In contrast, hometown doctors, lawyers, educators, and small business leaders almost always benefit their communities.
Only you and your kid can decide what’s right for them. Not all smart kids belong at or will thrive at HPYSM. And, that’s a good thing. If everyone in society acted like the most ambitious, we’d kill each other for scraps.
“ First, it’s not about smarts. Every school among the Top 25 universities and Top 15 liberal arts colleges have a very similar academic profile.”
You nailed this part. Looking at the rest of your comment through the eyes of someone who attended the ‘M’ in HYPSM it doesn’t hold there at all.
As to the other schools, the eastern three do seem to attract an abundance of narcissists and strivers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a difference in quality, what is taught, how it is taugt, and connections. Is the difference meaningful. Could be. May not be.
College is a launching pad. You can get a similar result from Towson as Harvard for a specific individual. But there may be more to take advantage of at Harvard. You may be challenged more. You may make more connections. All needed? No. But sure does not hurt. Also not everyone that went to Townson will come out the same as a top school.
The top schools give options that you cannot get anywhere else. Is there a difference among them? Sure but it gets smaller and smaller.
There is an enormous difference in resources available. Granted this is from AI, but a quick question indicates that the average need Grant from Towson is about $4,000 and the average need Grant from Harvard is about $70,000.
Anonymous wrote:There is a difference in quality, what is taught, how it is taugt, and connections. Is the difference meaningful. Could be. May not be.
College is a launching pad. You can get a similar result from Towson as Harvard for a specific individual. But there may be more to take advantage of at Harvard. You may be challenged more. You may make more connections. All needed? No. But sure does not hurt. Also not everyone that went to Townson will come out the same as a top school.
The top schools give options that you cannot get anywhere else. Is there a difference among them? Sure but it gets smaller and smaller.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of threads in this forum that tout HYPSM and denigrate other elite schools as “Ivy rejects,” much to the protest of parents and students at other elite schools. What’s going on here?
First, it’s not about smarts. Every school among the Top 25 universities and Top 15 liberal arts colleges have a very similar academic profile.
It is about two other variables:
1) dispositional intensity - HYPSM are looking for hyper-driven, highly competitive people who believe that worldly success/legacy is existential. Other elite schools, particularly those outside the NE, are looking for more balanced students that value Midwestern Southern or non-tech/SV Western values of hospitality, humility, and enjoyment of life.
2) regional cultural differences - HYPSM
draws heavily from the Northeast, elite private high schools and global strivers. Amongst these groups, prestige awareness and achievement stacking is essential for external validation. For other elite schools that draw heavily from the South, Midwest, or non-tech West, ambition is more subtle, relational and not existential.
When the Ivy-or-bust group deride your kid’s choice as an “Ivy reject,” what they’re really saying is that you’re soft, not hardcore, like them. They want to be a Supreme Court justice; you want to be a local trust and estate lawyer. They want to create Facebook; you want to work at Facebook and get a stock grant.
While many would be tempted to applaud the world-changing desire of HYPSM, I’m not always impressed. First, much of what’s counted as an “advancement” is just incremental improvements on existing human habits. Second, much of this worldly success is privatized (think hedge funds and their ilk). Third, in the worst cases, crazy ambition leads to the breaking of social and institutional norms where society shoulders the consequences. In contrast, hometown doctors, lawyers, educators, and small business leaders almost always benefit their communities.
Only you and your kid can decide what’s right for them. Not all smart kids belong at or will thrive at HPYSM. And, that’s a good thing. If everyone in society acted like the most ambitious, we’d kill each other for scraps.
“ First, it’s not about smarts. Every school among the Top 25 universities and Top 15 liberal arts colleges have a very similar academic profile.”
You nailed this part. Looking at the rest of your comment through the eyes of someone who attended the ‘M’ in HYPSM it doesn’t hold there at all.
As to the other schools, the eastern three do seem to attract an abundance of narcissists and strivers.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody in their right mind tries to differentiate between kids who attend an ivy or a top non-ivy. In south, so many kids decline ivies for similar schools in warm climates.