Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republicans redistricting hard. When you can't win fairly...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-republicans-unveil-congressional-map-that-could-gift-them-five-seats/ar-AA1JADro?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=7f1c90dc109d475c88285f6d195627e9&ei=10
Republicans have unveiled a new congressional map in Texas that would allow the party to pick up as many as five additional congressional seats, an aggressive maneuver that has already met decisive outcry from Democrats and comes as the GOP tries to stave off losses in next year’s midterm elections.
Republicans already hold 25 of Texas’s 38 congressional seats. But at the urging of Donald Trump, Texas’s governor, Greg Abbott, called a special session this month to redraw the state’s congressional districts. After contentious hearings across the state, Republicans unveiled their proposed map on Wednesday.
Had the map been in place for the 2024 election, Trump would have carried 30 of the districts, while Kamala Harris would have carried just eight, according to data from Dave’s Redistricting App, an online tool that allows for analysis of voting districts.
The map unveiled on Wednesday represents the most aggressive effort for Republicans. While analysts said Republicans could target three Democratic seats easily, trying to claim more risked spreading GOP voters too thin.
I thought this was supposed to be the determining factor. Apparently they forgot when they made this map.
Guess Texas is turning blue.
Texas is getting a LOT of blue state transplants, if the republicans get too cute, it might backfire on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republicans redistricting hard. When you can't win fairly...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-republicans-unveil-congressional-map-that-could-gift-them-five-seats/ar-AA1JADro?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=7f1c90dc109d475c88285f6d195627e9&ei=10
Republicans have unveiled a new congressional map in Texas that would allow the party to pick up as many as five additional congressional seats, an aggressive maneuver that has already met decisive outcry from Democrats and comes as the GOP tries to stave off losses in next year’s midterm elections.
Republicans already hold 25 of Texas’s 38 congressional seats. But at the urging of Donald Trump, Texas’s governor, Greg Abbott, called a special session this month to redraw the state’s congressional districts. After contentious hearings across the state, Republicans unveiled their proposed map on Wednesday.
Had the map been in place for the 2024 election, Trump would have carried 30 of the districts, while Kamala Harris would have carried just eight, according to data from Dave’s Redistricting App, an online tool that allows for analysis of voting districts.
The map unveiled on Wednesday represents the most aggressive effort for Republicans. While analysts said Republicans could target three Democratic seats easily, trying to claim more risked spreading GOP voters too thin.
I thought this was supposed to be the determining factor. Apparently they forgot when they made this map.
Guess Texas is turning blue.
Anonymous wrote:This isn't a surprise, people voted for this
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/illinois-house-results
Here is the utterly ridiculous map of Illinois where I live. Voters are 43% R but only get 3 out of 17 congressional seats due to this map. It's just a fact of life.
IL and MD are dem states that gerrymander.
EVERY GOP state gerrymanders.
See the difference?
MD is no longer gerrymandered either. It was in the 2010-2020 cycle, but lawsuits and settlements, which included Hogan, led to a non-gerrymandered map.
Dems need to fight fire with fire. They could easily pick up 10 seats just in CA. There are a dozen between NY, MD, NJ.
That's a nice opinion you have there. Too bad it's just that.
I have never known a democrat to hold back on anything when it comes to winning elections. They break every precedent they can.
You aren't going to pick up 10 seats in California and you know it. You just constantly throw sh** against the wall in hopes it will stick.
Anonymous wrote:How horrible that Rs are finally playing your game, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How horrible that Rs are finally playing your game, OP.
Not the OP, but the Dems have generally conceded states to non-partisan redistricting and in fact the NY Governor cost the Dems the House by not gerrymandering. Both CA and NY have said that if Texas does this, both states will gerrymander and the result will be untenable for the GOP, as they have nowhere else they can conjure more seats.
NY can't any time soon according to their state constitution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How horrible that Rs are finally playing your game, OP.
Not the OP, but the Dems have generally conceded states to non-partisan redistricting and in fact the NY Governor cost the Dems the House by not gerrymandering. Both CA and NY have said that if Texas does this, both states will gerrymander and the result will be untenable for the GOP, as they have nowhere else they can conjure more seats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/illinois-house-results
Here is the utterly ridiculous map of Illinois where I live. Voters are 43% R but only get 3 out of 17 congressional seats due to this map. It's just a fact of life.
IL and MD are dem states that gerrymander.
EVERY GOP state gerrymanders.
See the difference?
MD is no longer gerrymandered either. It was in the 2010-2020 cycle, but lawsuits and settlements, which included Hogan, led to a non-gerrymandered map.
Dems need to fight fire with fire. They could easily pick up 10 seats just in CA. There are a dozen between NY, MD, NJ.
That's a nice opinion you have there. Too bad it's just that.
I have never known a democrat to hold back on anything when it comes to winning elections. They break every precedent they can.
You aren't going to pick up 10 seats in California and you know it. You just constantly throw sh** against the wall in hopes it will stick.
Anonymous wrote:Republicans redistricting hard. When you can't win fairly...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-republicans-unveil-congressional-map-that-could-gift-them-five-seats/ar-AA1JADro?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=7f1c90dc109d475c88285f6d195627e9&ei=10
Republicans have unveiled a new congressional map in Texas that would allow the party to pick up as many as five additional congressional seats, an aggressive maneuver that has already met decisive outcry from Democrats and comes as the GOP tries to stave off losses in next year’s midterm elections.
Republicans already hold 25 of Texas’s 38 congressional seats. But at the urging of Donald Trump, Texas’s governor, Greg Abbott, called a special session this month to redraw the state’s congressional districts. After contentious hearings across the state, Republicans unveiled their proposed map on Wednesday.
Had the map been in place for the 2024 election, Trump would have carried 30 of the districts, while Kamala Harris would have carried just eight, according to data from Dave’s Redistricting App, an online tool that allows for analysis of voting districts.
The map unveiled on Wednesday represents the most aggressive effort for Republicans. While analysts said Republicans could target three Democratic seats easily, trying to claim more risked spreading GOP voters too thin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/illinois-house-results
Here is the utterly ridiculous map of Illinois where I live. Voters are 43% R but only get 3 out of 17 congressional seats due to this map. It's just a fact of life.
IL and MD are dem states that gerrymander.
EVERY GOP state gerrymanders.
See the difference?
MD is no longer gerrymandered either. It was in the 2010-2020 cycle, but lawsuits and settlements, which included Hogan, led to a non-gerrymandered map.
Dems need to fight fire with fire. They could easily pick up 10 seats just in CA. There are a dozen between NY, MD, NJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/illinois-house-results
Here is the utterly ridiculous map of Illinois where I live. Voters are 43% R but only get 3 out of 17 congressional seats due to this map. It's just a fact of life.
IL and MD are dem states that gerrymander.
EVERY GOP state gerrymanders.
See the difference?
MD is no longer gerrymandered either. It was in the 2010-2020 cycle, but lawsuits and settlements, which included Hogan, led to a non-gerrymandered map.
Dems need to fight fire with fire. They could easily pick up 10 seats just in CA. There are a dozen between NY, MD, NJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How horrible that Rs are finally playing your game, OP.
Oooooo that’s a BINGO!!!!

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/illinois-house-results
Here is the utterly ridiculous map of Illinois where I live. Voters are 43% R but only get 3 out of 17 congressional seats due to this map. It's just a fact of life.
IL and MD are dem states that gerrymander.
EVERY GOP state gerrymanders.
See the difference?