Anonymous wrote:I spent a good bit of time (months) in Switzerland as a child and remember very little of it. I do remember European vacations to other locations.
Personally it’s very far to travel with kids. I’d take my kids hiking in Vermont and save the $ and emissions. Your kids don’t care if the hiking is VT or Switzerland. You eventually get used to the scenery anyway.
Perhaps leave the kids at home if you need to go hiking in Switzerland and not the US.
Anonymous wrote:Geneva is fun for 2 days. It is small but very nice and there is enough to see for a weekend. It seems like it would be a great place to live. Switzerland is stunning. You could do lots of day trips or 3-4 days in other parts.
Anonymous wrote:Op here. Thanks PPs! I have Multiple Sclerosis so I try to stay in major cities for medical care needs if they unexpectedly pop up and I’m a bit unsure of the terrain in those mountainous regions. How’s the terrain for someone with balance struggles?
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't spend a week in either city. Spend your time in the mountains or around Lac Lucerne.
Just spent a week in skiing in Zermatt this winter and definitely not bored. Poorer, but not bored.
Anonymous wrote:There are some cities I just wouldn't take our kids to - incl Florence, Salzburg, Innsbruck, Budapest or Geneva. They just aren't into art on that deep of a level or have anything interesting to do or see in the others. I LOVE them but my 14 and 12 year olds prefer Rome, Tokyo, Venice. It's simply a matter of sophistication I suppose and my kids are just not going to be into 5 days of scenery no matter how beautiful. Mine need stuff to do and more engagement over culture and museums. Know your audiencemaybe your family will love!
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't spend a week in either city. Spend your time in the mountains or around Lac Lucerne.
Just spent a week in skiing in Zermatt this winter and definitely not bored. Poorer, but not bored.