Anonymous wrote:The government already has a very clean, simple, cheap way to establish paternity when married women give birth: the child is presumed to be a product of the marriage and the woman’s husband is legally the father. Switching from that method of determining paternity to paying for tons of DNA testing and potentially blowing up families has no benefit to the state, so there’s no reason for them to require that. Furthermore, civil rights organizations would fight against huge swaths of the population having to turn over their DNA to the government when no crime has been committed.
A man can have DNA testing done without involving the government as long as he has access to the child, which, presumably, he does if he’s legally the father.
Anonymous wrote:The government already has a very clean, simple, cheap way to establish paternity when married women give birth: the child is presumed to be a product of the marriage and the woman’s husband is legally the father. Switching from that method of determining paternity to paying for tons of DNA testing and potentially blowing up families has no benefit to the state, so there’s no reason for them to require that. Furthermore, civil rights organizations would fight against huge swaths of the population having to turn over their DNA to the government when no crime has been committed.
A man can have DNA testing done without involving the government as long as he has access to the child, which, presumably, he does if he’s legally the father.
Anonymous wrote:I’d say the backlog of untested rape kits would be a higher priority by an order of magnitude than this, if we are going to be throwing money and hours into testing dna.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bad idea and total overreach.
+1 terrible idea. I have two very close friends who both have children fathered by AP’s instead of their H’s. This would wreck probably 10-20% of marriages.
HORRIBLE IDEA.
No, that's exactly why its needed. Women cheats and gets a free pass. Kids have a right to know as do dad's. If the divorce happens a man should not have to pay for at least 18 years, if not longer for a child who isn't his and lied to. They should be held accountable.
Lol. Since when is pregnancy "a free pass"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bad idea and total overreach.
+1 terrible idea. I have two very close friends who both have children fathered by AP’s instead of their H’s. This would wreck probably 10-20% of marriages.
HORRIBLE IDEA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m fine with the availability of a free test at the hospital if either parent wants it. I think getting the government involved in families is a bad idea.
I suspect the percentage is lower than whatever the manosphere claims. Some men know. Others don’t care.
Not the manosphere. The numbers from 23andme and Ancestry dot com are much higher than anyone had expected.
Oh.
Anonymous wrote:- of all newborns?
Also:
- what would you guess is the percentage of children born in wedlock who are genetically the father’s child?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bad idea and total overreach.
+1 terrible idea. I have two very close friends who both have children fathered by AP’s instead of their H’s. This would wreck probably 10-20% of marriages.
HORRIBLE IDEA.
No, that's exactly why its needed. Women cheats and gets a free pass. Kids have a right to know as do dad's. If the divorce happens a man should not have to pay for at least 18 years, if not longer for a child who isn't his and lied to. They should be held accountable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m fine with the availability of a free test at the hospital if either parent wants it. I think getting the government involved in families is a bad idea.
I suspect the percentage is lower than whatever the manosphere claims. Some men know. Others don’t care.
Not the manosphere. The numbers from 23andme and Ancestry dot com are much higher than anyone had expected.
Oh.
Anonymous wrote:I’d say the backlog of untested rape kits would be a higher priority by an order of magnitude than this, if we are going to be throwing money and hours into testing dna.
Anonymous wrote:Why?? I think they can already mandate it if someone is trying to reject paternity, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bad idea and total overreach.
+1 terrible idea. I have two very close friends who both have children fathered by AP’s instead of their H’s. This would wreck probably 10-20% of marriages.
HORRIBLE IDEA.
+1 mandating sending a vulnerable woman who has just given birth and her newborn home with her husband and that new knowledge is like an engraved invitation to domestic violence.