Anonymous wrote:Fetterman. One of the representatives from Maine voted with Republicans a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fetterman. One of the representatives from Maine voted with Republicans a bit.
US Senator Fetterman from Pennsylvania and the Republican US Senator from Maine are both reasonable individuals willing to listen and to hear both sides of an issue.
Susan Collins?! Oh sure. She'll listen and talk about how concerned she is...but while Mitch was in charge she did what he told her to. Every single time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fetterman. One of the representatives from Maine voted with Republicans a bit.
US Senator Fetterman from Pennsylvania and the Republican US Senator from Maine are both reasonable individuals willing to listen and to hear both sides of an issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Politicians today cannot spell bipartisanship, let alone comprehend the word’s meaning or importance.
Fetterman is the only one recently “caught” conversing over a meal with the other side. I’m not a Republican and I’m not a Fetterman fan, but I was pleasantly surprised by this. The rest are too emotionally fragile like Trump.
Bipartisanship doesn't motivate the hyper-partisan sheep to donate their hard earned money to our rotten major political parties. Division and hatred for the other is the trigger for the Fox News and MSNBC watching grandma and grandpas to forfeit a portion of their monthly incomes to fund RNC and DNC candidates.
Why give your hard earned money to politicians if you don't hate the other side? These political parties have us all figured out and we're all pawns in their money making schemes. Stop hating the other "side" and start seeing the big picture for what it is!
Anonymous wrote:The "two sides" are the liberals and the progressives, like in every civilized country.
The Nazis don't deserve a seat at any table.
Anonymous wrote:Politicians today cannot spell bipartisanship, let alone comprehend the word’s meaning or importance.
Fetterman is the only one recently “caught” conversing over a meal with the other side. I’m not a Republican and I’m not a Fetterman fan, but I was pleasantly surprised by this. The rest are too emotionally fragile like Trump.
Anonymous wrote:A different take as to why centrism won't work, and is actually counter-productive to centrist ideals during a time like this: https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2025/07/what-exactly-is-required-to-preserve-our-democracy/683492/?gift=xC_35bkfSCnmAUbAzEjt0UG3iHnYMmNyqWIXW6ETd_k&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share
Of course, it depends on whether you see Trump as fundamentally anti-democratic or not.
Anonymous wrote:Fetterman. One of the representatives from Maine voted with Republicans a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can they listen to, debate with, and hang out with someone with opposing views? I’m thinking of RBG and Scalia being able to tussle about legal/political matters yet be friends who bonded over opera(?). I would like to hear more about people like that. Those are people I want leading us. Not people who are digging deeper trenches on each side of the aisle.
I’m uninterested in bipartisanship. There’s almost nothing we can agree on. I would be interested in amicably dividing the country into two self-governing halves in order to avoid civil war.
This again...how would it be amicable? Nearly every state has blue areas and red areas. There would be dozens or hundreds of armed groups that would try to take advantage of the instability.
Separate the states and the people will follow.
Anonymous wrote:Massie.