Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
I hope not. They all need to go, especially Brenda and Karla. Karla should not be working at MC as an MCPS liaison as it’s a huge conflict of interest and probably why they push kids to Mc vs having classes at the schools.
How is that even ethically possible for Karla Silvestre? I get that a salary of 25k as an McPs board member isn’t enough to make a living but that is a massive conflict of interest.
It’s the actual job that’s the issue. And, how does she get that much time off to do board work during the day?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
I hope not. They all need to go, especially Brenda and Karla. Karla should not be working at MC as an MCPS liaison as it’s a huge conflict of interest and probably why they push kids to Mc vs having classes at the schools.
How is that even ethically possible for Karla Silvestre? I get that a salary of 25k as an McPs board member isn’t enough to make a living but that is a massive conflict of interest.
Silvestre recuses herself from any board votes relating to MC, and the relationship between MCPS and MC has been in place long before she was on the board. If voters disapprove, they are of course free to vote for her opponents.
She recuses herself from voting on the operating budget? Really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
I hope not. They all need to go, especially Brenda and Karla. Karla should not be working at MC as an MCPS liaison as it’s a huge conflict of interest and probably why they push kids to Mc vs having classes at the schools.
How is that even ethically possible for Karla Silvestre? I get that a salary of 25k as an McPs board member isn’t enough to make a living but that is a massive conflict of interest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
I hope not. They all need to go, especially Brenda and Karla. Karla should not be working at MC as an MCPS liaison as it’s a huge conflict of interest and probably why they push kids to Mc vs having classes at the schools.
How is that even ethically possible for Karla Silvestre? I get that a salary of 25k as an McPs board member isn’t enough to make a living but that is a massive conflict of interest.
Silvestre recuses herself from any board votes relating to MC, and the relationship between MCPS and MC has been in place long before she was on the board. If voters disapprove, they are of course free to vote for her opponents.
She recuses herself from voting on the operating budget? Really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
I hope not. They all need to go, especially Brenda and Karla. Karla should not be working at MC as an MCPS liaison as it’s a huge conflict of interest and probably why they push kids to Mc vs having classes at the schools.
How is that even ethically possible for Karla Silvestre? I get that a salary of 25k as an McPs board member isn’t enough to make a living but that is a massive conflict of interest.
Silvestre recuses herself from any board votes relating to MC, and the relationship between MCPS and MC has been in place long before she was on the board. If voters disapprove, they are of course free to vote for her opponents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
I hope not. They all need to go, especially Brenda and Karla. Karla should not be working at MC as an MCPS liaison as it’s a huge conflict of interest and probably why they push kids to Mc vs having classes at the schools.
How is that even ethically possible for Karla Silvestre? I get that a salary of 25k as an McPs board member isn’t enough to make a living but that is a massive conflict of interest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
I hope not. They all need to go, especially Brenda and Karla. Karla should not be working at MC as an MCPS liaison as it’s a huge conflict of interest and probably why they push kids to Mc vs having classes at the schools.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Brenda Wolff, Karla Silvestre, and Grace Rivera-Oven will run for reelection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That will be a huge loss. Julie is the only good member of the BOE.
Yeah not sure why we keep electing others who are useless and just rubber stamp everything MCPS does
When has Julie Yang voted against something MCPS proposed?
But at least she’s the only one who questions MCPS. Others don’t even ask questions about these dramatic changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That will be a huge loss. Julie is the only good member of the BOE.
Yeah not sure why we keep electing others who are useless and just rubber stamp everything MCPS does
When has Julie Yang voted against something MCPS proposed?
But at least she’s the only one who questions MCPS. Others don’t even ask questions about these dramatic changes.
Anonymous wrote:Those going in want to make changes little do they realize what happens when they are in, whether it's as a staff or a member of the BOE. #shutupandkeepimage
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That will be a huge loss. Julie is the only good member of the BOE.
Yeah not sure why we keep electing others who are useless and just rubber stamp everything MCPS does
When has Julie Yang voted against something MCPS proposed?
But at least she’s the only one who questions MCPS. Others don’t even ask questions about these dramatic changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That will be a huge loss. Julie is the only good member of the BOE.
Yeah not sure why we keep electing others who are useless and just rubber stamp everything MCPS does
When has Julie Yang voted against something MCPS proposed?
But at least she’s the only one who questions MCPS. Others don’t even ask questions about these dramatic changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That will be a huge loss. Julie is the only good member of the BOE.
The fact that she's the best on the BOE says a lot about the BOE. I think Julie is going to have a hard time winning her council seat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That will be a huge loss. Julie is the only good member of the BOE.
Yeah not sure why we keep electing others who are useless and just rubber stamp everything MCPS does
When has Julie Yang voted against something MCPS proposed?