Anonymous
Post 07/13/2025 22:08     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:Not the norm but many people who can afford that don’t like to have to deal with drug dealers and gun fights. Peace out.


Do you know how much it takes to keep up a house? Not so bad when you compare. Plus the older, larger condos have higher monthly condo fees but they sell for a trifle, which means your tax base will be much lower than a comparable house or townhouse. I am looking forward to buying a condo soon after our youngest graduates from college.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2025 14:33     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s a new construction condo in the same area, similar size, with much lower HOA fees. https://redf.in/eNbjw4


Watch out though because low HOA fees can just mean they’re not preparing adequately for the future when they will need to replace elevators, roofs, windows etc etc. Then they will dramatically hike the fees and/or do a big assessment.
That is exactly my point. The HOAs on this new construction are likely artificially low because the developer is trying to make it more desirable and artificially inflate the buyer pool that can qualify for a loan. I suspect that the original condo listed on this thread had similar HOA fees when it was first built. The annual HOA fee increasing from 300 to 1000 would be capitalized into the property value and reduce the value of the property by around 5%.


HOA fees will continue to increase year after year. It’s not like insurance premiums are going down, or maintainence costs.


HOA fees (for condos) increase faster than the overall inflation rate. There is a collective action problem with HOAs because the preventative maintenance is split between multiple owners. The other problem is that the ownership structure for condos creates a situation where it is incredible difficult to sell the entire building for demolition and redevelopment. Condos building tend to stick around much longer than their economically useful life with high HOA fees because it’s difficult to get a supermajority of members to agree to sell.


I imagine most condo HOA boards are severely mismanaged too. Who wants to actually take on more work?
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2025 09:05     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s a new construction condo in the same area, similar size, with much lower HOA fees. https://redf.in/eNbjw4


Watch out though because low HOA fees can just mean they’re not preparing adequately for the future when they will need to replace elevators, roofs, windows etc etc. Then they will dramatically hike the fees and/or do a big assessment.
That is exactly my point. The HOAs on this new construction are likely artificially low because the developer is trying to make it more desirable and artificially inflate the buyer pool that can qualify for a loan. I suspect that the original condo listed on this thread had similar HOA fees when it was first built. The annual HOA fee increasing from 300 to 1000 would be capitalized into the property value and reduce the value of the property by around 5%.


HOA fees will continue to increase year after year. It’s not like insurance premiums are going down, or maintainence costs.


HOA fees (for condos) increase faster than the overall inflation rate. There is a collective action problem with HOAs because the preventative maintenance is split between multiple owners. The other problem is that the ownership structure for condos creates a situation where it is incredible difficult to sell the entire building for demolition and redevelopment. Condos building tend to stick around much longer than their economically useful life with high HOA fees because it’s difficult to get a supermajority of members to agree to sell.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2025 08:24     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Condos are the worst investment you can do. When we bought our house in 2019 the condos that were selling for 500k are selling today in 2025 for 450k. In the meantime the house we bought in 2019 for $500k is worth $700k today.


SFHs are bad investments also. Property taxes, maintenance, renovations so that the house doesn't become dated, buying too much stuff to fill the space, commuting costs -- all of it adds up, and if owners are really honest with themselves, they'll realize that owning is not a winning proposition in most cases except if your timing is perfect and you buy before a real estate upswing (such as 2019-2021). Better to put your money in S&P index funds, but alas all of us need a place to live so the best move is to buy no more space than you need and try to minimize maintenance and taxes.


Can you live in your stock portfolio? Do index funds provide a shelter or roof over your head? No. I never said they are a better investment than the S&P 500, but they are a better investment than condos and you they typically hold their value after adjusting for inflation. You need to live somewhere and purchasing a single family home will typically result in more wealth accumulation than buying a condo or permanently renting.


+1 If you have a family, then you want to live somewhere that can comfortably fit everyone and either has good schools or pay for private. Most people aren't hoarding millions in investments while forcing their family to live like poor people.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 23:11     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s a new construction condo in the same area, similar size, with much lower HOA fees. https://redf.in/eNbjw4


Watch out though because low HOA fees can just mean they’re not preparing adequately for the future when they will need to replace elevators, roofs, windows etc etc. Then they will dramatically hike the fees and/or do a big assessment.
That is exactly my point. The HOAs on this new construction are likely artificially low because the developer is trying to make it more desirable and artificially inflate the buyer pool that can qualify for a loan. I suspect that the original condo listed on this thread had similar HOA fees when it was first built. The annual HOA fee increasing from 300 to 1000 would be capitalized into the property value and reduce the value of the property by around 5%.


HOA fees will continue to increase year after year. It’s not like insurance premiums are going down, or maintainence costs.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 20:55     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s a new construction condo in the same area, similar size, with much lower HOA fees. https://redf.in/eNbjw4


Watch out though because low HOA fees can just mean they’re not preparing adequately for the future when they will need to replace elevators, roofs, windows etc etc. Then they will dramatically hike the fees and/or do a big assessment.
That is exactly my point. The HOAs on this new construction are likely artificially low because the developer is trying to make it more desirable and artificially inflate the buyer pool that can qualify for a loan. I suspect that the original condo listed on this thread had similar HOA fees when it was first built. The annual HOA fee increasing from 300 to 1000 would be capitalized into the property value and reduce the value of the property by around 5%.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 20:36     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a new construction condo in the same area, similar size, with much lower HOA fees. https://redf.in/eNbjw4


Watch out though because low HOA fees can just mean they’re not preparing adequately for the future when they will need to replace elevators, roofs, windows etc etc. Then they will dramatically hike the fees and/or do a big assessment.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 19:52     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Condos are the worst investment you can do. When we bought our house in 2019 the condos that were selling for 500k are selling today in 2025 for 450k. In the meantime the house we bought in 2019 for $500k is worth $700k today.


SFHs are bad investments also. Property taxes, maintenance, renovations so that the house doesn't become dated, buying too much stuff to fill the space, commuting costs -- all of it adds up, and if owners are really honest with themselves, they'll realize that owning is not a winning proposition in most cases except if your timing is perfect and you buy before a real estate upswing (such as 2019-2021). Better to put your money in S&P index funds, but alas all of us need a place to live so the best move is to buy no more space than you need and try to minimize maintenance and taxes.


Can you live in your stock portfolio? Do index funds provide a shelter or roof over your head? No. I never said they are a better investment than the S&P 500, but they are a better investment than condos and you they typically hold their value after adjusting for inflation. You need to live somewhere and purchasing a single family home will typically result in more wealth accumulation than buying a condo or permanently renting.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 16:48     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:A lot of the pre construction condo sales around that time sold too high. There was a big condo construction boom around then. Declines like that mostly happened during the condo sell out.


+1. I think it is more of a case of overpaying in the first instance. Would need to pull more comps but this price doesn’t seem wildly low or high for Logan Circle/Shaw. The parking spot alone in that area is worth roughly $50k.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 15:01     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Anonymous wrote:Condos are the worst investment you can do. When we bought our house in 2019 the condos that were selling for 500k are selling today in 2025 for 450k. In the meantime the house we bought in 2019 for $500k is worth $700k today.


SFHs are bad investments also. Property taxes, maintenance, renovations so that the house doesn't become dated, buying too much stuff to fill the space, commuting costs -- all of it adds up, and if owners are really honest with themselves, they'll realize that owning is not a winning proposition in most cases except if your timing is perfect and you buy before a real estate upswing (such as 2019-2021). Better to put your money in S&P index funds, but alas all of us need a place to live so the best move is to buy no more space than you need and try to minimize maintenance and taxes.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 11:30     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

A lot of the pre construction condo sales around that time sold too high. There was a big condo construction boom around then. Declines like that mostly happened during the condo sell out.
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 10:41     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

Here’s a new construction condo in the same area, similar size, with much lower HOA fees. https://redf.in/eNbjw4
Anonymous
Post 07/05/2025 10:12     Subject: DC condo: $900k in 2017 -> $770k in 2025

If you want to find out, you have to pull a bunch of comps. You can’t just use one condo as a crystal ball.

Personally, I think new condos go through the same cycle as new SFH developments, but faster. Unless the location is red hot, imo 10-25 years old is a tough age for a condo development. It starts to look a little tired, trends have changed, and if the condo association has been mismanaged you start to find out when big ticket maintenance things start coming due.