Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are going to allow retakes, let the kids retake up to a 100. Who does that hurt? The teachers aren't doing anything by hand. Everything is automated. Even English tests are multiple choice.
I am an English teacher. The only multiple-choice assessments we, as a department, give are the ones provided by the district (which are required but are not graded). Every other assessment is short answer or essay-based.
On average, our students have five or six summative assessments per quarter, one or two of which are full-length essays.
Anonymous wrote:Is Madison going to continue skills-based grading with the new change to the re-assessment policy? Seems unfair to make kids retake the same skill three times now and only have previous “skills” be replaced to 90. I’m thinking this will most affect math where the skills actually are repeated. More room for interpretation in the other classes since the skills aren’t actually being retested, they are more for show.
Anonymous wrote:If you are going to allow retakes, let the kids retake up to a 100. Who does that hurt? The teachers aren't doing anything by hand. Everything is automated. Even English tests are multiple choice.
Anonymous wrote:There's no accountability for the quality ofnthe tests. When a "test" is only four questions and multiple choice with no partial credit, one mistake in a calculation and the kid has a C. So one little mistake has a huge effect on the grade but piles of homework and classwork count for nothing. Its stressful for the kids and letting them retake up to an A was the counterbalance to that.
No kids used the first test for "review" bc every teacher required huge packets to be completed (no credit for completing review packets) before another chance at the four multiple choice questions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are going to allow retakes, let the kids retake up to a 100. Who does that hurt? The teachers aren't doing anything by hand. Everything is automated. Even English tests are multiple choice.
My kid’s private school offered retakes but they were always capped so you could improve your grade but the poor initial grade always mattered. My kid has learning disabilities so it was hard. However…it did incentivize doing as well as you could on the first test and not just using it as review. I think the only thing that matters is learning the material, but I did want my kid to have the practice of grades mattering the first time for when he gets to college.
Anonymous wrote:If you are going to allow retakes, let the kids retake up to a 100. Who does that hurt? The teachers aren't doing anything by hand. Everything is automated. Even English tests are multiple choice.
Anonymous wrote:How does it promote equity?
Anonymous wrote:Had a friend who taught at NOVA. Said, no grades for homework, but if you are borderline between grades, he would use that as the determining factor. I think he thought that doing homework reflected effort.
I think some homework is appropriate. An English class without papers? Really? A math class without practice?
Homework gives the students an opportunity to figure out where they are struggling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does it promote equity?
In the past, grades could included things like homework (either graded homework or completed homework) as part of the grade.
However, homework is racist. So it must be ungraded, or eliminated.
Some of the most anti-homework parents I know are white. They don’t think Larla should be forced to do homework after school and dance/acro/parkour class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does it promote equity?
In the past, grades could included things like homework (either graded homework or completed homework) as part of the grade.
However, homework is racist. So it must be ungraded, or eliminated.