Anonymous wrote:
Dems sacrificed a whole day, and there’s still no king. Sorry, guys.

Then there day was worth it!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time, energy and money. Lame parade. Everyone is laughing at the empty stands.

Yeah, too bad it cost $90 million to laugh at Trump. The most fitting sign I saw. "Why Enough Money for a Parade, but No Money for Medicaid?"

+1 And on top of it all, Trump sat through the parade looking like a tired drunk on the Metro who didn’t realize he just missed his stop.

OMG, this made me laugh!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OMFG

Hippies who want to relive their glory days of protesting, they’ve never matured.

Elderly white haired man hitting a doll around and “protesting,” jfc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time, energy and money. Lame parade. Everyone is laughing at the empty stands.

Yeah, too bad it cost $90 million to laugh at Trump. The most fitting sign I saw. "Why Enough Money for a Parade, but No Money for Medicaid?"

+1 And on top of it all, Trump sat through the parade looking like a tired drunk on the Metro who didn’t realize he just missed his stop.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The no kings was a flop.

+1

Only a few geriatrics and some purple-haired weirdos showed up.

What are your thoughts on the parade. It was thrown in honor of a sad-faced geriatric's birthday.

Dems sacrificed a whole day, and there’s still no king. Sorry, guys.

Anonymous wrote:

OMFG

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Trump going to order an investigation into the crowd size? Claim the pictures were photoshopped? 😆

Nah, they are already putting out AI photos via the official accounts. There's a guy on X zooming in and showing the messed up AI manipulation that the WH didn't catch. Like a guy in the front row with 3 arms. Another is someone with a leg off to the side that looks like a tail. I think someone found a cyclops (someone with just 1 centralized eye). And he showed that after row 3, it's all blurs of colors not actual humans.

omg please post

Anonymous wrote:The no kings was a flop.

+1

Only a few geriatrics and some purple-haired weirdos showed up.

The no kings was a flop.

Anonymous wrote:

Oh, so, instead of humorously taking out a few frustrations on an inanimate object, in a country rife with guns, you’d like to belittle the maturity of someone like this? Are you one of those Jan 6 / NRA apologists?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/more-than-30-people-hospitalized-following-trump-military-parade/ar-AA1GOOeb?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=6fa4563e5d494213abe8c4e6c912bc29&ei=10

D.C. officials report that 31 people were taken to the hospital during the Army's 250th military parade. They note that a total of 48 individuals were evaluated, but the remaining 17 were not transported.

The Army celebrated its 250th birthday on Saturday, coinciding with President Donald Trump's birthday, who had pushed for the event to take place. It showcased helicopters, military aircraft, 128 tanks, and over 6,000 soldiers parading down Constitution Avenue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it difficult to respect the rank because the man currently in the Oval office is a convicted felon and ajudicated racist

Respect the rank, not the man is a military credo.

You can hate your superior officer as a person, but you will still respect his rank and the orders that come from that rank.

I think "just following orders" as a defense went out of fashion with the Nuremberg trial. Are you saying that people must blindly follow every order Trump makes, even as he increasingly violates laws?

Anonymous wrote:I find it difficult to respect the rank because the man currently in the Oval office is a convicted felon and ajudicated racist

Respect the rank, not the man is a military credo.

You can hate your superior officer as a person, but you will still respect his rank and the orders that come from that rank.