Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some college presidents will be using the current Federal administration as political top cover for cost-cutting they want to do for unrelated reasons.
This is likely to be the case. It is always difficult to cut costs when those costs are employees. Naturally, there will always be unpleasant pushback from those losing their jobs.
Perhaps universities will come through this trial more efficient than they were. The employees are the ones who will suffer most. Students may suffer at the margins, though that depends on the specifics of what is cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some college presidents will be using the current Federal administration as political top cover for cost-cutting they want to do for unrelated reasons.
This is likely to be the case. It is always difficult to cut costs when those costs are employees. Naturally, there will always be unpleasant pushback from those losing their jobs.
Perhaps universities will come through this trial more efficient than they were. The employees are the ones who will suffer most. Students may suffer at the margins, though that depends on the specifics of what is cut.
Wait til the parents start complaining that their tuition costs keep rising, but suddenly no one will return their phone calls or answer their emails. Their kids will have harder times getting the classes they need as sections are collapsed. Mental health counselors will be in shorter supply as some of their kids spiral. Gym hours will be condensed. Garbage will pile up in the dorms as housekeeping is stretched…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some college presidents will be using the current Federal administration as political top cover for cost-cutting they want to do for unrelated reasons.
This is likely to be the case. It is always difficult to cut costs when those costs are employees. Naturally, there will always be unpleasant pushback from those losing their jobs.
Perhaps universities will come through this trial more efficient than they were. The employees are the ones who will suffer most. Students may suffer at the margins, though that depends on the specifics of what is cut.
Anonymous wrote:Schools seem like they have to become need aware during the Trump administration. Maybe they'll technically be need blind but use algorithms to make the class less dependent on financial aid. If Yale is liquidating assets, this can't be good for other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Some college presidents will be using the current Federal administration as political top cover for cost-cutting they want to do for unrelated reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, why does administration want to crash PE? I’m a science person so not understanding the Econ rationale.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, why does administration want to crash PE? I’m a science person so not understanding the Econ rationale.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait, why does administration want to crash PE? I’m a science person so not understanding the Econ rationale.
He wants to crash everything to force us to be reliant on American products.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, why does administration want to crash PE? I’m a science person so not understanding the Econ rationale.
Anonymous wrote:Moody's just came out to say that individual investors in PE funds is a risky thing. I know that's institutions, but Yale's endowment is PE heavy. Sounds like they are not giving the returns people always assume. Reading this article, it sounds like they sought 6 billion and are getting 3 billion, which is not just a haircut discount. I never thought this would the crash until the Moody's story but maybe PE was too overhyped. Now they're trying to offload investments to individuals.
Anonymous wrote:Moody's just came out to say that individual investors in PE funds is a risky thing. I know that's institutions, but Yale's endowment is PE heavy. Sounds like they are not giving the returns people always assume. Reading this article, it sounds like they sought 6 billion and are getting 3 billion, which is not just a haircut discount. I never thought this would the crash until the Moody's story but maybe PE was too overhyped. Now they're trying to offload investments to individuals.
Anonymous wrote:Moody's just came out to say that individual investors in PE funds is a risky thing. I know that's institutions, but Yale's endowment is PE heavy. Sounds like they are not giving the returns people always assume. Reading this article, it sounds like they sought 6 billion and are getting 3 billion, which is not just a haircut discount. I never thought this would the crash until the Moody's story but maybe PE was too overhyped. Now they're trying to offload investments to individuals.