Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought it was dumb and sad. A rich man with a nice face and good personality would absolutely be able to get a nice and pretty woman. Chris Evans is nowhere near as good looking with his weird teeth and he was such a loser.
+1 They really didn't need to make Chris Evans quite so much of a loser, ruined the film.
You know, you're so right. It's rare to be as old as he was and still living like that. Maybe 10 years earlier, 7 if we're being very generous, but at some point, things get a little better. You go ahead and pick up those extra catering shifts. You increase your standard of living.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought it was dumb and sad. A rich man with a nice face and good personality would absolutely be able to get a nice and pretty woman. Chris Evans is nowhere near as good looking with his weird teeth and he was such a loser.
+1 They really didn't need to make Chris Evans quite so much of a loser, ruined the film.
Anonymous wrote:I thought it was dumb and sad. A rich man with a nice face and good personality would absolutely be able to get a nice and pretty woman. Chris Evans is nowhere near as good looking with his weird teeth and he was such a loser.
Anonymous wrote:I just saw this movie and loved it. I that Dakota Johnson was God and I've really come around on her as an actress.
But I thought the writing was great and the premise thought provoking.
In particular, I loved how the moon cue explored the idea of what makes people feel valuable or worthy (or undervalued or worthless) in a relationship. Or how a relationship can make them feel valuable or worthless in the world. I loved the scenes where characters negotiated terms with one another, and addressed these concepts directly.
I also really liked how they addressed the reality of risk in dating, with the SA plotline, and what it means for women in particular to look for love.
I even liked the whole height thing, even though my DH found the surgery twist mildly ludicrous, because it just goes directly towards the question if status, and how that impacts ones marketability in dating. And I loved that moment when Harry "shrinks" and creates this visual that is so fascinating to read my own reaction to. Pascal genuinely gets less attractive in that moment, and I think partly they used perspective and lighting to make that happen,but I also think it's psychological. My DH and I had a whole convo about the height thing after (DH is 5'10", which coincidentally is also Pedro Pascal's real life height). On the one hand, I definitely never had an expectation that any man I dated he 6' (though some were)and I thought friends with this expectation were foolish because I'd do much rather have a kind and attractive man who is 5'10" than someone with an inferior personality who was taller. But also I was never attracted to men my height or shorter (I'm 5'5"). Anyway the height thing was a great issue for this movie because it's very shallow and also it tangibly matters somehow.
Anyway, I thought it was really great. I love that Celine Song made a movie that was more mainstream Hollywood, but stayed true to the thoughtful storytelling that was so good I'm Past Lives. This is one of my favorite romance movies in recent memory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ I thought Dakota Johnson was good, not God, lol
Was more interested in movie when take was she was God and picking the more helpless. If “just” woman and picks the going nowhere, less so.
Anonymous wrote:^ I thought Dakota Johnson was good, not God, lol
Anonymous wrote:I just saw this movie and loved it. I that Dakota Johnson was God and I've really come around on her as an actress.
But I thought the writing was great and the premise thought provoking.
In particular, I loved how the moon cue explored the idea of what makes people feel valuable or worthy (or undervalued or worthless) in a relationship. Or how a relationship can make them feel valuable or worthless in the world. I loved the scenes where characters negotiated terms with one another, and addressed these concepts directly.
I also really liked how they addressed the reality of risk in dating, with the SA plotline, and what it means for women in particular to look for love.
I even liked the whole height thing, even though my DH found the surgery twist mildly ludicrous, because it just goes directly towards the question if status, and how that impacts ones marketability in dating. And I loved that moment when Harry "shrinks" and creates this visual that is so fascinating to read my own reaction to. Pascal genuinely gets less attractive in that moment, and I think partly they used perspective and lighting to make that happen,but I also think it's psychological. My DH and I had a whole convo about the height thing after (DH is 5'10", which coincidentally is also Pedro Pascal's real life height). On the one hand, I definitely never had an expectation that any man I dated he 6' (though some were)and I thought friends with this expectation were foolish because I'd do much rather have a kind and attractive man who is 5'10" than someone with an inferior personality who was taller. But also I was never attracted to men my height or shorter (I'm 5'5"). Anyway the height thing was a great issue for this movie because it's very shallow and also it tangibly matters somehow.
Anyway, I thought it was really great. I love that Celine Song made a movie that was more mainstream Hollywood, but stayed true to the thoughtful storytelling that was so good I'm Past Lives. This is one of my favorite romance movies in recent memory.
Anonymous wrote:I just saw this movie and loved it. I that Dakota Johnson was God and I've really come around on her as an actress.
But I thought the writing was great and the premise thought provoking.
In particular, I loved how the moon cue explored the idea of what makes people feel valuable or worthy (or undervalued or worthless) in a relationship. Or how a relationship can make them feel valuable or worthless in the world. I loved the scenes where characters negotiated terms with one another, and addressed these concepts directly.
I also really liked how they addressed the reality of risk in dating, with the SA plotline, and what it means for women in particular to look for love.
I even liked the whole height thing, even though my DH found the surgery twist mildly ludicrous, because it just goes directly towards the question if status, and how that impacts ones marketability in dating. And I loved that moment when Harry "shrinks" and creates this visual that is so fascinating to read my own reaction to. Pascal genuinely gets less attractive in that moment, and I think partly they used perspective and lighting to make that happen,but I also think it's psychological. My DH and I had a whole convo about the height thing after (DH is 5'10", which coincidentally is also Pedro Pascal's real life height). On the one hand, I definitely never had an expectation that any man I dated he 6' (though some were)and I thought friends with this expectation were foolish because I'd do much rather have a kind and attractive man who is 5'10" than someone with an inferior personality who was taller. But also I was never attracted to men my height or shorter (I'm 5'5"). Anyway the height thing was a great issue for this movie because it's very shallow and also it tangibly matters somehow.
Anyway, I thought it was really great. I love that Celine Song made a movie that was more mainstream Hollywood, but stayed true to the thoughtful storytelling that was so good I'm Past Lives. This is one of my favorite romance movies in recent memory.