Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds more like they did a poor job of negotiating - should have realized that your raise would come at the expense of something, teachers. In this case, it's class size. Is it worth it?
The union did a really bad job at negotiating. It’s shocking how bad they were. They sold out their teachers for pay raises for non members.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
+1. I'm being destaffed. Even though I'm arguably a better teacher than others in my dept (based on test scores and student opinions), I'm getting cut because I have only 9 years in the county vs over 15 for the other teachers. They care about seniority rather than effectiveness. Unions are selfish entities that haven't been relevant since the 1950s.
Forgive my ignorance, is this the same as being laid off?
Asking because I keep hearing about a severe shortage?
Destaffed teachers are usually placed at another school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
Larger class size, in-school support positions being cut, extra duty assignments during the day. This is not a win. This is completely bogus. The so-called "union" got played.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds more like they did a poor job of negotiating - should have realized that your raise would come at the expense of something, teachers. In this case, it's class size. Is it worth it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
+1. I'm being destaffed. Even though I'm arguably a better teacher than others in my dept (based on test scores and student opinions), I'm getting cut because I have only 9 years in the county vs over 15 for the other teachers. They care about seniority rather than effectiveness. Unions are selfish entities that haven't been relevant since the 1950s.
Forgive my ignorance, is this the same as being laid off?
Asking because I keep hearing about a severe shortage?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
+1. I'm being destaffed. Even though I'm arguably a better teacher than others in my dept (based on test scores and student opinions), I'm getting cut because I have only 9 years in the county vs over 15 for the other teachers. They care about seniority rather than effectiveness. Unions are selfish entities that haven't been relevant since the 1950s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
+1. I'm being destaffed. Even though I'm arguably a better teacher than others in my dept (based on test scores and student opinions), I'm getting cut because I have only 9 years in the county vs over 15 for the other teachers. They care about seniority rather than effectiveness. Unions are selfish entities that haven't been relevant since the 1950s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.
+1. I'm being destaffed. Even though I'm arguably a better teacher than others in my dept (based on test scores and student opinions), I'm getting cut because I have only 9 years in the county vs over 15 for the other teachers. They care about seniority rather than effectiveness. Unions are selfish entities that haven't been relevant since the 1950s.
This is the first time unions have been allowed to negotiate. Before you just belonged to an association.Anonymous wrote:I’m so mad I’ve been paying dues for 15 years. They are so unhelpful and I’m not sure the people who even answer calls knows anything about FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like our so called union is a big fail for teachers. Our Superintendent owns the union and she tells them what to do.
Hilarious. They got everything they asked for in their first contract, with the exception of 1% of the salary increase. You’re a clown
This came at a price. There are currently hundreds of school-based instructional positions being cut to balance the budget. Destaff letters are still being sent out. Not sure I would call this a win.