Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is the winner for Wall Street by a long shot. They only have about 2,000 grads per year.
Cornell is twice the size.

Really? There at least a dozen schools including three NESCAC LACs which place considerably better than Columbia on a per capita basis.

Wrong. The NESCACs start placing around 10th best.

https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/best-wallstreet-feeder-schools-per-capita

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is the winner for Wall Street by a long shot. They only have about 2,000 grads per year.
Cornell is twice the size.

Really? There at least a dozen schools including three NESCAC LACs which place considerably better than Columbia on a per capita basis.

Data please.

"Getting hired" by a company doesn't account for what roles they are hired in. Lots of schools send tons of kids to mid and back office jobs at banks, or FP&A at FAANG. Perfectly fine jobs but not what Ivy Leaguers are aspiring to.

Anonymous wrote:It's a very tough year for tech. The majority of the NGs could not land a job.

The MAJORITY? Find that hard to believe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

These numbers are not normalized.

This - many of the schools that send the most per capita are smaller/more prestigious colleges than large publics.

Location of the school also matters.

As someone stated, SJSU is in the heart of SV, and lots of the grads get hired at those companies in SV. I went to SJSU. I eventually ended up working for a FAANG.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

These numbers are not normalized.

This - many of the schools that send the most per capita are smaller/more prestigious colleges than large publics.

The tech bros are getting fired. Tech has the 7th highest unemployment rate now.

Who wants to work for FAANG anymore? Go work for a cybersecurity company or an AI startup.

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is the winner for Wall Street by a long shot. They only have about 2,000 grads per year.
Cornell is twice the size.

Location in NYC (self-selecting) coupled with bright kids.

Anonymous wrote:You need to normalize the numbers.

m
They obviously didn’t go to an Ivy. Lol

Anonymous wrote:And number of kids Wall Street and tech is the measure of what exactly? Oh for the days of kids wanting to do good, not just get rich 😞

IKR, I don't measure schools by the size of their pipeline.

Anyone who finds this meaningful also likely considers USN&WR to be useful. Use your brains.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For tech? San Jose state is the number one feeder.

Not really for FAANG anymore.

-former SJSU CS

SJSU still places very well including into FAANGs

Anonymous wrote:For tech? San Jose state is the number one feeder.

Not really for FAANG anymore.

-former SJSU CS

Anonymous wrote:Columbia is the winner for Wall Street by a long shot. They only have about 2,000 grads per year.
Cornell is twice the size.

Really? There at least a dozen schools including three NESCAC LACs which place considerably better than Columbia on a per capita basis.