Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Greatly increase the county legislative reps & BOE seats to make them more individually/local-communuty responsive. Make planning boards similarly elected instead of appointed. Get rid of at-large seats which only reinforce majority hegemony. Elect them every 2 years. Pay these elected reps well enough to make the job full time at a reasonably professional level. Counter the increased cost of their salaries with lower allocations for legislative staff, since they wouldn't need as much outreach support to cover their smaller constituencies. Force the above with ballot initiatives.
Side benefit: special interests that end up with outsized influence from their campaign contributions would see that influence diluted.
Yeah, and guess what happens, more boards, more councils, etc etc after breakups mean more pols. More pols mean more govt salaries and lifetime pensions and retirement healthcare plans you now have to fund. That means a doubling, tripling, or quadrupling of propety taxes and local taxes/fees.
You people never learn lessons from what has already been done before...aka New Jersey.
I can't wait until this happens and then people piss and moan about $50, 60, 90, 100+ k property tax bills per year like NJ.
Not exactly. Don't balkanize into smaller districts. Still have one Board of Supervisors (or County Council), one BOE, etc., but have more members of each accountable to fewer. Don't allow seniority to confer, institutionally, greater power. More pols, yes, each with salaries, but lower than current for the county legislators (BOEs need bumps, though) and with lower numbers of staff (offsetting the increase in legislators), as they'd be expected to handle more direct interaction with constituents since the constituent-legislator ratio would be lower. And each pol would have less concentrated power.
New Jersey, as another poster mentioned, followed the balkanized, town-by-town path. That's the one with more councils, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Greatly increase the county legislative reps & BOE seats to make them more individually/local-communuty responsive. Make planning boards similarly elected instead of appointed. Get rid of at-large seats which only reinforce majority hegemony. Elect them every 2 years. Pay these elected reps well enough to make the job full time at a reasonably professional level. Counter the increased cost of their salaries with lower allocations for legislative staff, since they wouldn't need as much outreach support to cover their smaller constituencies. Force the above with ballot initiatives.
Side benefit: special interests that end up with outsized influence from their campaign contributions would see that influence diluted.
Yeah, and guess what happens, more boards, more councils, etc etc after breakups mean more pols. More pols mean more govt salaries and lifetime pensions and retirement healthcare plans you now have to fund. That means a doubling, tripling, or quadrupling of propety taxes and local taxes/fees.
You people never learn lessons from what has already been done before...aka New Jersey.
I can't wait until this happens and then people piss and moan about $50, 60, 90, 100+ k property tax bills per year like NJ.
Anonymous wrote:Greatly increase the county legislative reps & BOE seats to make them more individually/local-communuty responsive. Make planning boards similarly elected instead of appointed. Get rid of at-large seats which only reinforce majority hegemony. Elect them every 2 years. Pay these elected reps well enough to make the job full time at a reasonably professional level. Counter the increased cost of their salaries with lower allocations for legislative staff, since they wouldn't need as much outreach support to cover their smaller constituencies. Force the above with ballot initiatives.
Side benefit: special interests that end up with outsized influence from their campaign contributions would see that influence diluted.
Anonymous wrote:In Fairfax we have total Democratic hegemony and they constantly let the Franconia, Mason, and Mount Vernon Districts rip off the rest of the county.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Fairfax we have total Democratic hegemony and they constantly let the Franconia, Mason, and Mount Vernon Districts rip off the rest of the county.
There is a Republican supervisor on the board.
Anonymous wrote:In Fairfax we have total Democratic hegemony and they constantly let the Franconia, Mason, and Mount Vernon Districts rip off the rest of the county.