Perhaps you don't know which students are applying for need-based aid and which ones are full pay?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been teaching AP for many, many years. Most of my students are the 4.0 unweighted GPA types. They volunteer, are varsity athletes, and they are doing all they can to look good for college. Some truly stand out, but most are very strong candidates.
And then college admissions come and the results appear random. The true stand-outs face surprising rejections and the “just” strong candidate got in instead.
Here’s what I think: students have to meet a threshold to make it into the “considered” pile at a college. But after making it into that pile, the choice itself appears random.
All the kids can really do is get themselves into the pile. Then cross fingers and hope for the best.
I think you are accurate all the way until your point about the threshold to be considered pile. After that, it is not random though it may look that way to the outside. The decisions are based on things like.:
- Major (classics gets in over bio; gender studies over engineering; English over CS)
- Talent/ability (National award winning squash player gets in over varsity baseball captain; neither recruited. National ranked figure skater gets on over state champion soccer player; neither recruited)
- essays (what kids reveal in essays matters a lot more than people think.) There is a right way to do essays in the wrong way to do essays. Unfortunately, most HS English teachers advise kids to do the wrong thing. It’s not about overcomplicated sentence and essay structures. The writing should be at easy to read/grasp level; varied sentences, including some very short sentences; poignant, personal, and touching on at least 3-4 of your personal values. It should also not repeat anything covered anywhere else in the application, including your major.
- LOR (an exceptional LOR can make a difference)
Look at the T10 scoring rubrics. You can see why certain kids get in once you understand the scoring.
I’m the PP. I still see it as random. I help with the essays. (No, I don’t advise poetic, flowery essays. People do that?) I write those exceptional LOR. I see the variety of majors.
And, after all these years, it still seems random. I know these students more than admissions officers ever will. Sometimes the admissions appear way off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been teaching AP for many, many years. Most of my students are the 4.0 unweighted GPA types. They volunteer, are varsity athletes, and they are doing all they can to look good for college. Some truly stand out, but most are very strong candidates.
And then college admissions come and the results appear random. The true stand-outs face surprising rejections and the “just” strong candidate got in instead.
Here’s what I think: students have to meet a threshold to make it into the “considered” pile at a college. But after making it into that pile, the choice itself appears random.
All the kids can really do is get themselves into the pile. Then cross fingers and hope for the best.
I think you are accurate all the way until your point about the threshold to be considered pile. After that, it is not random though it may look that way to the outside. The decisions are based on things like.:
- Major (classics gets in over bio; gender studies over engineering; English over CS)
- Talent/ability (National award winning squash player gets in over varsity baseball captain; neither recruited. National ranked figure skater gets on over state champion soccer player; neither recruited)
- essays (what kids reveal in essays matters a lot more than people think.) There is a right way to do essays in the wrong way to do essays. Unfortunately, most HS English teachers advise kids to do the wrong thing. It’s not about overcomplicated sentence and essay structures. The writing should be at easy to read/grasp level; varied sentences, including some very short sentences; poignant, personal, and touching on at least 3-4 of your personal values. It should also not repeat anything covered anywhere else in the application, including your major.
- LOR (an exceptional LOR can make a difference)
Look at the T10 scoring rubrics. You can see why certain kids get in once you understand the scoring.
I’m the PP. I still see it as random. I help with the essays. (No, I don’t advise poetic, flowery essays. People do that?) I write those exceptional LOR. I see the variety of majors.
And, after all these years, it still seems random. I know these students more than admissions officers ever will. Sometimes the admissions appear way off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall
Not this year
Always. Even a school like Landon that’s not a Big 3 had much, much better college placements than any public school in the area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall
Not this year
Always. Even a school like Landon that’s not a Big 3 had much, much better college placements than any public school in the area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been teaching AP for many, many years. Most of my students are the 4.0 unweighted GPA types. They volunteer, are varsity athletes, and they are doing all they can to look good for college. Some truly stand out, but most are very strong candidates.
And then college admissions come and the results appear random. The true stand-outs face surprising rejections and the “just” strong candidate got in instead.
Here’s what I think: students have to meet a threshold to make it into the “considered” pile at a college. But after making it into that pile, the choice itself appears random.
All the kids can really do is get themselves into the pile. Then cross fingers and hope for the best.
I think you are accurate all the way until your point about the threshold to be considered pile. After that, it is not random though it may look that way to the outside. The decisions are based on things like.:
- Major (classics gets in over bio; gender studies over engineering; English over CS)
- Talent/ability (National award winning squash player gets in over varsity baseball captain; neither recruited. National ranked figure skater gets on over state champion soccer player; neither recruited)
- essays (what kids reveal in essays matters a lot more than people think.) There is a right way to do essays in the wrong way to do essays. Unfortunately, most HS English teachers advise kids to do the wrong thing. It’s not about overcomplicated sentence and essay structures. The writing should be at easy to read/grasp level; varied sentences, including some very short sentences; poignant, personal, and touching on at least 3-4 of your personal values. It should also not repeat anything covered anywhere else in the application, including your major.
- LOR (an exceptional LOR can make a difference)
Look at the T10 scoring rubrics. You can see why certain kids get in once you understand the scoring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall
Not this year
Anonymous wrote:I’ve been teaching AP for many, many years. Most of my students are the 4.0 unweighted GPA types. They volunteer, are varsity athletes, and they are doing all they can to look good for college. Some truly stand out, but most are very strong candidates.
And then college admissions come and the results appear random. The true stand-outs face surprising rejections and the “just” strong candidate got in instead.
Here’s what I think: students have to meet a threshold to make it into the “considered” pile at a college. But after making it into that pile, the choice itself appears random.
All the kids can really do is get themselves into the pile. Then cross fingers and hope for the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall
Private high school grads make up a disproportionately large percentage of the incoming freshmen classes at private T20 colleges.
They are a small overall % of US high school graduates - but a large percentage of incoming freshman at private colleges. Ask yourself how. And why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had an intelligent but not unusual, otherwise unremarkable student get into Harvard, and I'm sure ROTC was her hook. She talked with them a few times, and was told that they had spoken to Admissions and that Admissions assured them they were looking "very favorably" at her file. Then she was admitted. She also got into Yale and Cornell.
So, ROTC. Not sure if I'd advise anyone to take that route unless they were already so inclined, though.
I’m sure someone who got into 3 ivies has more than ROTC going for them.
Anonymous wrote:I had an intelligent but not unusual, otherwise unremarkable student get into Harvard, and I'm sure ROTC was her hook. She talked with them a few times, and was told that they had spoken to Admissions and that Admissions assured them they were looking "very favorably" at her file. Then she was admitted. She also got into Yale and Cornell.
So, ROTC. Not sure if I'd advise anyone to take that route unless they were already so inclined, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feeder school aka mostly private
lol facts say otherwise
Public’s do better overall